Seth Anil K, Dienes Zoltán, Cleeremans Axel, Overgaard Morten, Pessoa Luiz
Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QJ, UK.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Aug;12(8):314-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 Jul 5.
The resurgent science of consciousness has been accompanied by a recent emphasis on the problem of measurement. Having dependable measures of consciousness is essential both for mapping experimental evidence to theory and for designing perspicuous experiments. Here, we review a series of behavioural and brain-based measures, assessing their ability to track graded consciousness and clarifying how they relate to each other by showing what theories are presupposed by each. We identify possible and actual conflicts among measures that can stimulate new experiments, and we conclude that measures must prove themselves by iteratively building knowledge in the context of theoretical frameworks. Advances in measuring consciousness have implications for basic cognitive neuroscience, for comparative studies of consciousness and for clinical applications.
意识科学的复兴伴随着近期对测量问题的重视。拥有可靠的意识测量方法对于将实验证据与理论相匹配以及设计清晰明了的实验都至关重要。在此,我们回顾了一系列基于行为和大脑的测量方法,评估它们追踪意识分级的能力,并通过展示每种测量方法所预设的理论来阐明它们之间的相互关系。我们识别出测量方法之间可能存在和实际存在的冲突,这些冲突能够激发新的实验,并且我们得出结论,测量方法必须通过在理论框架背景下反复构建知识来证明自身价值。意识测量的进展对基础认知神经科学、意识的比较研究以及临床应用都具有重要意义。