Noorman Samuel, Stein Timo, Fahrenfort Johannes Jacobus, van Gaal Simon
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Elife. 2025 May 1;13:RP97900. doi: 10.7554/eLife.97900.
This study investigates failures in conscious access resulting from either weak sensory input (perceptual impairments) or unattended input (attentional impairments). Participants viewed a Kanizsa stimulus with or without an illusory triangle within a rapid serial visual presentation of distractor stimuli. We designed a novel Kanizsa stimulus that contained additional ancillary features of different complexity (local contrast and collinearity) that were independently manipulated. Perceptual performance on the Kanizsa stimulus (presence vs. absence of an illusion) was equated between the perceptual (masking) and attentional (attentional blink) manipulation to circumvent common confounds related to conditional differences in task performance. We trained and tested classifiers on electroencephalogram (EEG) data to reflect the processing of specific stimulus features, with increasing levels of complexity. We show that late stages of processing (200-250 ms), reflecting the integration of complex stimulus features (collinearity, illusory triangle), were impaired by masking but spared by the attentional blink. In contrast, decoding of local contrast (the spatial arrangement of stimulus features) was observed early in time (80 ms) and was left largely unaffected by either manipulation. These results replicate previous work showing that feedforward processing is largely preserved under both perceptual and attentional impairments. Crucially, however, under matched levels of performance, only attentional impairments left the processing of more complex visual features relatively intact, likely related to spared lateral and local feedback processes during inattention. These findings reveal distinct neural mechanisms associated with perceptual and attentional impairments and thus contribute to a comprehensive understanding of distinct neural stages leading to conscious access.
本研究调查了因微弱感觉输入(感知障碍)或未被注意的输入(注意障碍)导致的意识通达失败。参与者在快速序列视觉呈现的干扰刺激中观看了带有或不带有虚幻三角形的卡尼兹三角刺激。我们设计了一种新颖的卡尼兹三角刺激,其包含不同复杂度(局部对比度和共线性)的额外辅助特征,并对这些特征进行独立操控。在感知(掩蔽)和注意(注意瞬脱)操控之间,使卡尼兹三角刺激上的感知表现(错觉的存在与否)相等,以规避与任务表现中的条件差异相关的常见混淆因素。我们在脑电图(EEG)数据上训练和测试分类器,以反映特定刺激特征的处理情况,且特征复杂度不断增加。我们发现,反映复杂刺激特征(共线性、虚幻三角形)整合的后期处理阶段(约200 - 250毫秒)受到掩蔽的损害,但在注意瞬脱情况下得以保留。相比之下,局部对比度(刺激特征的空间排列)的解码在早期(约80毫秒)就已观察到,并且在很大程度上不受任何一种操控的影响。这些结果重复了先前的研究工作,表明在前馈处理在感知和注意障碍下基本得以保留。然而,至关重要的是,在表现水平匹配的情况下,只有注意障碍使更复杂视觉特征的处理相对完整,这可能与注意力不集中时 spared lateral 和局部反馈过程得以保留有关。这些发现揭示了与感知和注意障碍相关的不同神经机制,从而有助于全面理解导致意识通达的不同神经阶段。