Paul Rhea, Orlovski Stephanie Miles, Marcinko Hillary Chuba, Volkmar Fred
Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Jan;39(1):115-25. doi: 10.1007/s10803-008-0607-1. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
Twenty-nine youth with autism spectrum disorders and 26 with typical development between 12 and 18 years of age were engaged in structured interviews (ADOS). The interviews were videotaped and rated for atypical conversational behaviors by trained raters, using the Pragmatic Rating Scale (Landa et al. Psychol Med 22:245-254, 1992). The ASD group was divided into AS and HFA/PDD-NOS subgroups. Significant differences were found among groups on approximately one-third of the PRS items. These items involved primarily the management of topics and information, reciprocity, intonation, and gaze management. The only differences to reach significance between the AS and HFA/PDD-NOS group were a greater tendency for overly formal speech on the part of the AS group, and more difficulty with gaze management on the part of the group with HFA/PDD-NOS. The implications of these findings for understanding and treating conversational deficits in ASD are discussed.
29名患有自闭症谱系障碍的青少年和26名年龄在12至18岁之间发育正常的青少年参与了结构化访谈(自闭症诊断观察量表)。访谈进行了录像,由经过培训的评估人员使用语用评定量表(兰达等人,《心理医学》22:245 - 254,1992年)对非典型对话行为进行评分。自闭症谱系障碍组被分为阿斯伯格综合征(AS)和高功能自闭症/未特定型广泛性发育障碍(HFA/PDD - NOS)亚组。在大约三分之一的语用评定量表项目上发现了组间的显著差异。这些项目主要涉及话题和信息管理、互动性、语调以及目光管理。AS组和HFA/PDD - NOS组之间唯一达到显著差异的是,AS组有更明显的过度正式言语倾向,而HFA/PDD - NOS组在目光管理方面存在更多困难。本文讨论了这些发现对于理解和治疗自闭症谱系障碍中对话缺陷的意义。