• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知功能可预测老年人的生存情况。

Cognitive functioning predicts survival in the elderly.

作者信息

Duff Kevin, Mold James W, Gidron Yori

机构信息

University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2009 Jan;31(1):90-5. doi: 10.1080/13803390801998664. Epub 2008 May 2.

DOI:10.1080/13803390801998664
PMID:18608698
Abstract

Prior studies of aging have identified a number of predictors of survival, including performances on some cognitive-functioning tests. However, few studies have used a multidomain test battery to identify which specific cognitive abilities predict death. The current study examined the 12 subtests of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) to see which subtests predicted death in a sample of 796 older, primary care patients. After 4 years, 98 individuals died, and 698 individuals remained alive. The individuals who died performed more poorly at baseline on 9 of the 12 RBANS subtests (p < .05) than did their peers who remained alive. In a multivariate analysis, however, only the RBANS Coding subtest independently predicted death (p < .001), along with male gender and greater initial medical comorbidity. Although the mechanism of poorer cognition and impending death remains unclear, some possibilities are discussed (e.g., brain dysfunction, poor medical compliance, impaired cellular immunity).

摘要

先前关于衰老的研究已经确定了一些生存预测因素,包括一些认知功能测试的表现。然而,很少有研究使用多领域测试组合来确定哪些特定的认知能力可以预测死亡。当前的研究对可重复神经心理状态评估量表(RBANS)的12个分测验进行了检验,以确定在796名老年初级保健患者样本中哪些分测验能够预测死亡。4年后,98人死亡,698人存活。死亡者在基线时,12个RBANS分测验中的9个表现比存活的同龄人更差(p < .05)。然而,在多变量分析中,只有RBANS编码分测验独立预测死亡(p < .001),同时还有男性性别和更高的初始医疗合并症。尽管认知能力较差与即将死亡之间的机制尚不清楚,但文中讨论了一些可能性(例如,脑功能障碍、医疗依从性差、细胞免疫受损)。

相似文献

1
Cognitive functioning predicts survival in the elderly.认知功能可预测老年人的生存情况。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2009 Jan;31(1):90-5. doi: 10.1080/13803390801998664. Epub 2008 May 2.
2
Normative and retest data on the RBANS cortical/subcortical index in older adults.老年人RBANS皮质/皮质下指数的常模和重测数据。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007 Nov;29(8):854-9. doi: 10.1080/13803390601147629. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
3
Age- and education-corrected independent normative data for the RBANS in a community dwelling elderly sample.社区居住老年样本中RBANS经年龄和教育校正的独立常模数据。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 Aug;17(3):351-66. doi: 10.1076/clin.17.3.351.18082.
4
Gender differences on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status subtests in older adults: baseline and retest data.老年人重复神经心理状态评估测试(RBANS)子测试中的性别差异:基线和重测数据。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Apr;33(4):448-55. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2010.533156. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
5
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
6
Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status effort index performance in a medically ill geriatric sample.用于评估患有内科疾病的老年样本神经心理状态努力指数表现的可重复性成套测验。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 May;24(3):231-5. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp026. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
7
Cognitive predictors of mortality in elderly retirees: results from the Freedom House study.老年退休人员死亡率的认知预测因素:自由之家研究结果
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;15(3):243-51. doi: 10.1097/01.JGP.0000240824.84867.02.
8
Regression-based formulas for predicting change in RBANS subtests with older adults.基于回归分析的预测老年人RBANS子测验变化的公式。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005 May;20(3):281-90. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2004.07.007.
9
Cognitive decline in high-functioning older persons is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization.高功能老年人的认知衰退与住院风险增加有关。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Sep;52(9):1456-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52407.x.
10
Embedded indices of effort in the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS) in a geriatric sample.在老年人群体中,重复神经心理状态评估测验(RBANS)的嵌入式努力指标。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Aug;24(6):1064-77. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2010.486009. Epub 2010 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Inferring Cognitive Abilities from Response Times to Web-Administered Survey Items in a Population-Representative Sample.在一个具有人口代表性的样本中,从对网络 administered 调查问卷项目的反应时间推断认知能力 。 注:这里“administered”不太明确准确意思,可能是“管理的”“实施的”等,结合语境推测整体意思如上。
J Intell. 2022 Dec 23;11(1):3. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11010003.
2
Digital Technology Differentiates Graphomotor and Information Processing Speed Patterns of Behavior.数字技术区分行为的运动速度和信息处理速度模式。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;82(1):17-32. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201119.
3
Slower Decline in Processing Speed Is Associated with Familial Longevity.
处理速度下降较慢与家族长寿有关。
Gerontology. 2022;68(1):17-29. doi: 10.1159/000514950. Epub 2021 May 4.
4
A Bidirectional Relationship between Executive Function and Health Behavior: Evidence, Implications, and Future Directions.执行功能与健康行为之间的双向关系:证据、启示及未来方向。
Front Neurosci. 2016 Aug 23;10:386. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00386. eCollection 2016.
5
Cognitive and personality factors in the prediction of health behaviors: an examination of total, direct and indirect effects.预测健康行为中的认知和人格因素:对总效应、直接效应和间接效应的考察。
J Behav Med. 2014 Dec;37(6):1057-68. doi: 10.1007/s10865-013-9535-4. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
6
Dietary quality may enhance survival related to cognitive impairment in Taiwanese elderly.饮食质量可能会提高台湾老年人认知障碍相关的生存率。
Food Nutr Res. 2011;55. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v55i0.7387. Epub 2011 Oct 30.
7
Cognitive function in families with exceptional survival.有异常生存的家庭中的认知功能。
Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Mar;33(3):619.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
8
Influence of biopsychosocial factors on the survival of the elderly in northeast Brazil-a prospective study.生物心理社会因素对巴西东北部老年人存活率的影响——一项前瞻性研究。
Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2010;2010. doi: 10.1155/2010/127605. Epub 2010 Sep 1.