Suppr超能文献

拉莫三嗪增强抗抑郁药对难治性抑郁症患者的疗效及安全性:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究

Efficacy and safety of antidepressant augmentation with lamotrigine in patients with treatment-resistant depression: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

作者信息

Santos Milena Antunes, Rocha Fábio Lopes, Hara Cláudia

机构信息

Mental Health Service of the City Hall of Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;10(3):187-90. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v10n0302.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study reports a clinical trial evaluating lamotrigine safety and efficacy as an antidepressant augmentation agent in treatment-resistant depression, therefore adding more empirical evidence to the limited number of studies on the use of lamotrigine.

METHOD

A double-blind pilot study was conducted between March 2004 and January 2006 with 34 nonbi-polar, nonpsychotic patients who had DSM-IV major depressive disorder and were resistant to at least 2 anti-depressants. The subjects were taking antidepressant therapy and were randomly assigned to receive placebo or lamotrigine as an adjunct therapy for 8 weeks. They were evaluated on a biweekly basis in order to assess the efficacy and the safety of the drug. Efficacy was measured with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale. Response was defined as a decrease of at least 50% from baseline on the MADRS and a final score ≤ 2 on the CGI. Safety was assessed by keeping record of treatment-emergent adverse events.

RESULTS

The results of the adjunct treatment with lamotrigine did not reveal a significant difference according to the MADRS (p = .45). No differences between the 2 treatment groups were revealed by the repeated-measures analysis of variance or by the analysis based on the CGI (p = .45). More than 50% of the patients had been treated with at least 3 different anti-depressants. The most frequent adverse events were nausea, rash, and dyspepsia in the lamotrigine group and dizziness and headache in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, although it was safe, lamotrigine was not found to be an efficient augmentation agent in treatment-resistant depression. Small sample size, higher chronicity, and refractoriness may be related to treatment failure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00652171.

摘要

目的

本研究报告了一项临床试验,评估拉莫三嗪作为抗抑郁增效剂在难治性抑郁症中的安全性和有效性,从而为使用拉莫三嗪的有限研究增加更多实证证据。

方法

2004年3月至2006年1月进行了一项双盲试验性研究,纳入34名非双相、非精神病性的患有DSM-IV重度抑郁症且对至少2种抗抑郁药耐药的患者。受试者正在接受抗抑郁治疗,并被随机分配接受安慰剂或拉莫三嗪作为辅助治疗,为期8周。每两周对他们进行评估,以评估药物的疗效和安全性。疗效通过蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)和临床总体印象(CGI)量表进行测量。缓解定义为MADRS较基线降低至少50%且CGI最终评分≤2。通过记录治疗中出现的不良事件来评估安全性。

结果

根据MADRS,拉莫三嗪辅助治疗的结果未显示出显著差异(p = 0.45)。重复测量方差分析或基于CGI的分析未显示两个治疗组之间存在差异(p = 0.45)。超过50%的患者曾接受过至少3种不同的抗抑郁药治疗。拉莫三嗪组最常见的不良事件是恶心、皮疹和消化不良,安慰剂组是头晕和头痛。

结论

在本研究中,尽管拉莫三嗪安全,但未发现其在难治性抑郁症中是一种有效的增效剂。样本量小、病程较长和难治性可能与治疗失败有关。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00652171。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression in adults.成人难治性抑郁症的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 17;12(12):CD010557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010557.pub2.

本文引用的文献

5
A rating scale for depression.一种抑郁症评定量表。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56.
7
Diagnosis and definition of treatment-resistant depression.难治性抑郁症的诊断与定义
Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Apr 15;53(8):649-59. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00231-2.
8
Lamotrigine augmentation in unipolar depression.拉莫三嗪用于单相抑郁的增效治疗。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003 Mar;18(2):97-9. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200303000-00006.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验