Suppr超能文献

优化:在实践中推行3R原则。

Refinement: promoting the three Rs in practice.

作者信息

Lloyd M H, Foden B W, Wolfensohn S E

机构信息

Science and Research Group, Home Office, Swindon, UK.

出版信息

Lab Anim. 2008 Jul;42(3):284-93. doi: 10.1258/la.2007.007045.

Abstract

Refinement of scientific procedures carried out on protected animals is an iterative process, which begins with a critical evaluation of practice. The process continues with objective assessment of the impact of the procedures, identification of areas for improvement, selection and implementation of an improvement strategy and evaluation of the results to determine whether there has been the desired effect, completing the refinement loop and resulting in the perpetuation of good practice. Refinements may be science-driven (those which facilitate getting high-quality results) or welfare-driven or may encompass both groups, but whatever the driver, refinements almost always result in benefits to both welfare and science. Refinements can be implemented in all aspects of animal use: improved methodology in invasive techniques, housing and husbandry, and even statistical analyses can all benefit animal welfare and scientific quality. If refinement is not actively sought, outdated and unnecessarily invasive techniques may not be replaced by better methods as they become available, and thus outdated information is passed down to the next generation, causing perpetuation of old-fashioned methods. This leads to a spiral of ignorance, leading ultimately to poor practice, poor animal welfare and poor-quality scientific data. Refinement is a legal and ethical requirement, yet refinements may not always be implemented. There are numerous obstacles to the implementation of refinement, which may be real or perceived. Either way, in order to take refinement forward, it is important to coordinate the approach to refinement, validate the science behind refinement, ensure there is adequate education and training in new techniques, improve liaison between users and make sure there is feedback on suitability of refinements for use. Overall, refinement requires a coordinated ongoing process of critical appraisal of practice and active scrutiny of resources for likely improvements. In the busy world of biomedical research, this process needs help. In order to develop these themes further, a workshop was held at the LASA Winter Meeting 2006, UK, to assist in identifying potential obstacles to refinement, and then to explore and develop strategies for overcoming these obstacles in key areas. A range of strategies appropriate to different circumstances was identified, which should facilitate the implementation of refinements.

摘要

对受保护动物实施的科学程序的优化是一个迭代过程,始于对实践的批判性评估。该过程接着是对程序影响的客观评估、确定改进领域、选择并实施改进策略以及评估结果以确定是否产生了预期效果,从而完成优化循环并使良好实践得以延续。优化可能由科学驱动(即有助于获得高质量结果的那些优化)或福利驱动,也可能涵盖这两类,但无论驱动因素是什么,优化几乎总是会给福利和科学都带来益处。优化可在动物使用的各个方面实施:侵入性技术、饲养管理以及甚至统计分析方面的改进方法都能使动物福利和科学质量受益。如果不积极寻求优化,过时且不必要的侵入性技术可能不会被出现的更好方法所取代,因此过时的信息会传递给下一代,导致老式方法的延续。这会导致无知的螺旋上升,最终导致实践不佳、动物福利差和科学数据质量差。优化是一项法律和道德要求,但优化可能并不总是得到实施。实施优化存在众多障碍,这些障碍可能是真实的或被感知到的。不管怎样,为了推进优化,协调优化方法、验证优化背后的科学、确保在新技术方面有足够的教育和培训、改善使用者之间的联络并确保对优化使用的适用性有反馈很重要。总体而言,优化需要对实践进行持续协调的批判性评估以及对可能改进的资源进行积极审查的过程。在生物医学研究这个繁忙的领域,这个过程需要帮助。为了进一步发展这些主题,2006年在英国举行的实验动物科学协会冬季会议上举办了一次研讨会,以协助识别优化的潜在障碍,然后探索并制定在关键领域克服这些障碍的策略。确定了一系列适用于不同情况的策略,这应有助于优化的实施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验