Duñabeitia Jon Andoni, Vidal-Abarca Eduardo
Departamento de Psicología Cognitiva, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Span J Psychol. 2008 May;11(1):26-35. doi: 10.1017/s113874160000408x.
Previous evidence with English beginning readers suggests that some orthographic effects, such as the orthographic neighborhood density effects, could be stronger for children than for adults. Particularly, children respond more accurately to words with many orthographic neighbors than to words with few neighbors. The magnitude of the effects for children is much higher than for adults, and some researchers have proposed that these effects could be progressively modulated according to reading expertise. The present paper explores in depth how children from 1st to 6th grade perform a lexical decision with words that are from dense or sparse orthographic neighborhoods, attending not only to accuracy measures, but also to response latencies, through a computer-controlled task. Our results reveal that children (like adults) show clear neighborhood density effects, and that these effects do not seem to depend on reading expertise. Contrarily to previous claims, the present work shows that orthographic neighborhood effects are not progressively modulated by reading skill. Further, these data strongly support the idea of a general language-independent preference for using the lexical route instead of grapheme-to-phoneme conversions, even in beginning readers. The implications of these results for developmental models in reading and for models in visual word recognition and orthographic encoding are discussed.
先前针对英语初学者的证据表明,一些正字法效应,比如正字法邻域密度效应,对儿童的影响可能比对成人的影响更大。具体而言,与邻字较少的单词相比,儿童对邻字较多的单词反应更准确。儿童的这种效应程度远高于成人,一些研究人员提出,这些效应可能会根据阅读技能逐步得到调节。本文通过一项计算机控制任务,深入探究了从一年级到六年级的儿童如何对来自正字法邻域密度高或低的单词进行词汇判断,不仅关注准确性指标,还关注反应潜伏期。我们的研究结果表明,儿童(与成人一样)表现出明显的邻域密度效应,而且这些效应似乎并不取决于阅读技能。与之前的观点相反,本研究表明正字法邻域效应不会因阅读技能而逐步得到调节。此外,这些数据有力地支持了这样一种观点,即即使是初学者,在使用词汇途径而非字母到音素转换方面,也存在一种与语言无关的普遍偏好。本文讨论了这些结果对阅读发展模型以及视觉单词识别和正字法编码模型的意义。