Celis Julio E, Gromov Pavel, Cabezón Teresa, Moreira José M A, Friis Esbern, Jirström Karin, Llombart-Bosch Antonio, Timmermans-Wielenga Vera, Rank Fritz, Gromova Irina
Department of Proteomics in Cancer, Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008 Oct;7(10):1795-809. doi: 10.1074/mcp.R800011-MCP200. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
Established histopathological criteria divide invasive breast carcinomas into defined groups. Ductal of no specific type and lobular are the two major subtypes accounting for around 75 and 15% of all cases, respectively. The remaining 10% include rarer types such as tubular, cribriform, mucinous, papillary, medullary, metaplastic, and apocrine breast carcinomas. Molecular profiling technologies, on the other hand, subdivide breast tumors into five subtypes, basal-like, luminal A, luminal B, normal breast tissue-like, and ERBB2-positive, that have different prognostic characteristics. An additional subclass termed "molecular apocrine" has recently been described, but these lesions did not exhibit all the histopathological features of classical invasive apocrine carcinomas (IACs). IACs make up 0.5-3% of the invasive ductal carcinomas, and despite the fact that they are morphologically distinct from other breast lesions, there are presently no standard molecular criteria available for their diagnosis and as a result no precise information as to their prognosis. Toward this goal our laboratories have embarked in a systematic proteomics endeavor aimed at identifying biomarkers that may characterize and subtype these lesions as well as targets that may lead to the development of novel targeted therapies and chemoprevention strategies. By comparing the protein expression profiles of apocrine macrocysts and non-malignant breast epithelial tissue we have previously reported the identification of a few proteins that are specifically expressed by benign apocrine lesions as well as by the few IACs that were available to us at the time. Here we reiterate our strategy to reveal apocrine cell markers and present novel data, based on the analysis of a considerably larger number of samples, establishing that IACs correspond to a distinct molecular subtype of breast carcinomas characterized by the expression of 15-prostaglandin dehydrogenase alone or in combination with a novel form of acyl-CoA synthetase medium-chain family member 1 (ACSM1). Moreover we show that 15-prostaglandin dehydrogenase is not expressed by other breast cancer types as determined by gel-based proteomics and immunohistochemistry analysis and that antibodies against this protein can identify IACs in an unbiased manner in a large breast cancer tissue microarray making them potentially useful as a diagnostic aid.
既定的组织病理学标准将浸润性乳腺癌分为不同的组。非特殊类型导管癌和小叶癌是两种主要亚型,分别占所有病例的约75%和15%。其余10%包括罕见类型,如管状、筛状、黏液性、乳头状、髓样、化生和大汗腺样乳腺癌。另一方面,分子谱分析技术将乳腺肿瘤细分为五种亚型,即基底样、腔面A型、腔面B型、正常乳腺组织样和ERBB2阳性型,它们具有不同的预后特征。最近描述了另一个亚类,称为“分子大汗腺样”,但这些病变并未表现出经典浸润性大汗腺癌(IAC)的所有组织病理学特征。IAC占浸润性导管癌的0.5%-3%,尽管它们在形态上与其他乳腺病变不同,但目前尚无用于其诊断的标准分子标准,因此也没有关于其预后的确切信息。为了实现这一目标,我们的实验室开展了一项系统的蛋白质组学研究,旨在鉴定可能对这些病变进行特征描述和分型的生物标志物,以及可能导致开发新型靶向治疗和化学预防策略的靶点。通过比较大汗腺囊肿和非恶性乳腺上皮组织的蛋白质表达谱,我们之前报告了鉴定出一些由良性大汗腺病变以及当时我们所拥有的少数IAC特异性表达的蛋白质。在此,我们重申我们揭示大汗腺细胞标志物的策略,并基于对大量样本的分析呈现新数据,证实IAC对应于乳腺癌的一种独特分子亚型,其特征是单独表达15-前列腺素脱氢酶或与新型中链酰基辅酶A合成酶家族成员1(ACSM1)联合表达。此外,我们通过基于凝胶的蛋白质组学和免疫组织化学分析表明,其他类型的乳腺癌不表达15-前列腺素脱氢酶,并且针对该蛋白的抗体可以在大型乳腺癌组织微阵列中无偏差地识别IAC,使其有可能作为一种诊断辅助手段。