Danish Centre for Translational Breast Cancer Research (DCTB), Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mol Oncol. 2009 Jun;3(3):220-37. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
Invasive apocrine carcinomas (IACs), as defined by morphological features, correspond to 0.3-4% of all invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC), and despite the fact that they are histologically distinct from other breast lesions there are currently no standard molecular criteria available for their diagnosis and no unequivocal information as to their prognosis. In an effort to address these concerns we have been using protein expression profiling technologies in combination with mass spectrometry and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to discover specific biomarkers that could allow us to molecularly characterize these lesions as well as to dissect some of the steps in the processes underlying breast apocrine metaplasia and development of precancerous apocrine lesions. Establishing these apocrine-specific markers as best practice for the routine pathology evaluation of breast cancer, however, will require their validation in large cohorts of patients. Towards this goal we have composed a panel of antibodies against components of an apocrine protein signature that includes probes against the apocrine-specific markers 15-prostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH), and acyl-CoA synthetase medium-chain family member 1 (ACSM1), in addition to a set of categorizing markers that are consistently expressed (AR, CD24) or not expressed (ERα, PgR, Bcl-2, and GATA-3) by apocrine metaplasia in benign breast lesions and apocrine sweat glands. This panel was used to analyze a well-defined cohort consisting of 14 apocrine ductal carcinoma in situ (ADCIS), and 33 IACs diagnosed at the Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo between 1997 and 2001. Samples were originally classified on the basis of cellular morphology with all cases having more than 90% of the tumour cells exhibiting cytological features typical of apocrine cells. Using the expression of 15-PGDH and/or ACSM1 as the main criterion, but taking into account the expression of other markers, we were able to identify unambiguously 13 out of 14 ADCIS (92.9%) and 20 out of 33 (60.6%) IAC samples, respectively, as being of apocrine origin. Our results demonstrate that IACs correspond to a distinct, even if heterogeneous, molecular subgroup of breast carcinomas that can be readily identified in an unbiased way using a combination of markers that recapitulate the phenotype of apocrine sweat glands (15-PGDH(+), ACSM1(+), AR(+), CD24(+), ERα(-), PgR(-), Bcl-2(-), and GATA-3(-)). These results pave the way for addressing issues such as prognosis of IACs, patient stratification for targeted therapeutics, as well as research strategies for identifying novel therapeutic targets for developing new cancer therapies.
浸润性大汗腺癌(IAC),根据形态学特征定义,占所有浸润性导管癌(IDC)的 0.3-4%,尽管它们在组织学上与其他乳腺病变不同,但目前尚无用于诊断的标准分子标准,也没有明确的信息说明其预后。为了解决这些问题,我们一直在使用蛋白质表达谱分析技术结合质谱和免疫组织化学(IHC)来发现特定的生物标志物,这些标志物可以使我们能够从分子上描述这些病变,并解析乳腺大汗腺化生和癌前大汗腺病变发展背后的一些步骤。然而,要将这些大汗腺特异性标志物确立为常规乳腺癌病理评估的最佳实践,就需要在大量患者队列中对其进行验证。为此,我们组成了一组针对大汗腺蛋白特征的抗体,其中包括针对大汗腺特异性标志物 15-前列腺素脱氢酶(15-PGDH)和酰基辅酶 A 合成酶中链家族成员 1(ACSM1)的探针,以及一组一致表达的分类标记物(AR、CD24)或不表达(ERα、PgR、Bcl-2 和 GATA-3)由良性乳腺病变和大汗腺中的大汗腺化生引起。该面板用于分析 1997 年至 2001 年在东京癌症研究所诊断的 14 例大汗腺导管原位癌(ADCIS)和 33 例 IAC 组成的定义明确的队列。最初根据细胞形态对样品进行分类,所有病例中超过 90%的肿瘤细胞表现出典型的大汗腺细胞的细胞学特征。使用 15-PGDH 和/或 ACSM1 的表达作为主要标准,但考虑到其他标记物的表达,我们能够分别明确识别 14 例 ADCIS(92.9%)中的 13 例和 33 例 IAC 样本(60.6%)中的 20 例是大汗腺来源的。我们的结果表明,IAC 对应于乳腺癌的一个独特的、即使是异质的分子亚群,使用能够重现大汗腺表型的标记物组合(15-PGDH(+),ACSM1(+),AR(+),CD24(+),ERα(-),PgR(-),Bcl-2(-)和 GATA-3(-)),可以以无偏倚的方式轻松识别。这些结果为解决 IAC 的预后、针对靶向治疗的患者分层以及为开发新的癌症治疗方法确定新的治疗靶点的研究策略等问题铺平了道路。