Heyer Eric J, Gold Mark I, Kirby E Will, Zurica Joseph, Mitchell Elizabeth, Halazun Hadi J, Teverbaugh Lauren, Sciacca Robert R, Solomon Robert A, Quest Donald O, Maldonado Thomas S, Riles Thomas S, Connolly E Sander
Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, 620 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2008 Aug;107(2):636-42. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181770d84.
In previous studies, we found that approximately 25% of patients having carotid endarterectomy with general anesthesia (CEA general) develop cognitive dysfunction compared with a surgical control Group 1 day and 1 mo after surgery. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that patients having CEA with regional anesthesia (CEA regional) will develop significant cognitive dysfunction 1 day after surgery compared with a control group of patients receiving sedation 1 day after surgery. We did not study persistence of dysfunction.
To test this hypothesis, we enrolled 60 patients in a prospective study. CEA regional was performed with superficial and deep cervical plexus blocks in 41 patients. The control group consisted of 19 patients having coronary angiography or coronary artery stenting performed with sedation. A control group is necessary to account for the "practice effect" associated with repeated cognitive testing. The patients from the CEA regional group were enrolled at New York Medical Center and the control group at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center. The cognitive performance of all patients was evaluated using a previously validated battery of neuropsychometric tests. Differences in performance, 1 day after compared with before surgery, were evaluated by both event-rate and group-rate analyses.
On postoperative day 1, 24.4% of patients undergoing CEA regional had significant cognitive dysfunction, where "significant" was defined as a total deficit score > or =2 SD worse than the mean performance in the control group.
Patients undergoing CEA regional had an incidence of cognitive dysfunction which was not different than patients having CEA general as previously published and compared with a contemporaneously enrolled group.
在先前的研究中,我们发现,与手术对照组相比,约25%接受全身麻醉的颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA全身麻醉)患者在术后1天和1个月时出现认知功能障碍。在本研究中,我们检验了以下假设:与术后1天接受镇静的对照组患者相比,接受区域麻醉的CEA(CEA区域麻醉)患者在术后1天会出现明显的认知功能障碍。我们未研究功能障碍的持续情况。
为检验该假设,我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,纳入60例患者。41例患者接受浅、深颈丛阻滞进行CEA区域麻醉。对照组由19例接受镇静下冠状动脉造影或冠状动脉支架置入术的患者组成。设立对照组是为了考虑与重复认知测试相关的“练习效应”。CEA区域麻醉组的患者在纽约医学中心入组,对照组在哥伦比亚长老会医学中心入组。所有患者的认知表现均使用一套先前验证过的神经心理测试进行评估。通过事件发生率和组发生率分析评估术后1天与术前相比的表现差异。
术后第1天,接受CEA区域麻醉的患者中有24.4%出现明显的认知功能障碍,其中“明显”定义为总缺陷评分比对照组平均表现差≥2个标准差。
接受CEA区域麻醉的患者认知功能障碍发生率与先前发表的接受CEA全身麻醉的患者以及同期入组的对照组相比无差异。