Heyer Eric J, Sharma Ruchey, Rampersad Anita, Winfree Christopher J, Mack William J, Solomon Robert A, Todd George J, McCormick Paul C, McMurtry James G, Quest Donald O, Stern Yaakov, Lazar Ronald M, Connolly E Sander
Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Arch Neurol. 2002 Feb;59(2):217-22. doi: 10.1001/archneur.59.2.217.
Although subtle cognitive injury as revealed by neuropsychological testing occurs in a substantial number of patients following carotid endarterectomy (CEA), there is controversy about whether this finding is a result of the surgery or the anesthesia.
To examine the changes in neuropsychological test performance in patients following CEA vs a control group of patients older than 60 years following spine surgery, so as to determine whether neuropsychological dysfunction after CEA is a result of surgery or anesthesia.
Patients undergoing CEA (n = 80) and lumbar spine surgery (n = 25) were assessed with a battery of neuropsychological tests preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 and 30. The neuropsychological performance of patients in the control group was used to normalize performance for patients in the CEA group, by calculating z scores using the mean and SD of the change scores in the control group. Significant cognitive dysfunction was defined as performance that exceeded 2 SDs above the mean performance of patients in the control group.
Postoperative days 1 and 30 total deficit scores were significantly worse in the CEA group compared with the controls. When individual test results were examined, the CEA group performed significantly worse than the controls on the Rey Complex Figure test and Halstead-Reitan Trails B on day 1, and on the Rey Complex Figure on day 30. Overall, cognitive dysfunction was seen in 22 patients (28%) in the CEA group on day 1 and in 11 (23%) of 48 patients on day 30.
Subtle cognitive decline following CEA occurs and persists for at least several weeks after surgery. This decline was absent in a control group.
尽管在大量颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的患者中,神经心理学测试显示存在轻微认知损伤,但对于这一发现是手术还是麻醉所致存在争议。
比较CEA患者与60岁以上脊柱手术对照组患者神经心理学测试表现的变化,以确定CEA术后神经心理功能障碍是手术还是麻醉的结果。
对接受CEA的患者(n = 80)和腰椎手术患者(n = 25)在术前以及术后第1天和第30天进行一系列神经心理学测试评估。通过使用对照组变化分数的均值和标准差计算z分数,用对照组患者的神经心理学表现对CEA组患者的表现进行标准化。显著认知功能障碍定义为超过对照组患者平均表现2个标准差以上的表现。
与对照组相比,CEA组术后第1天和第30天的总缺陷分数显著更差。检查个体测试结果时,CEA组在术后第1天的雷氏复杂图形测试和霍尔斯特德-赖坦连线测验B以及术后第30天的雷氏复杂图形测试中的表现显著差于对照组。总体而言,CEA组在术后第1天有22名患者(28%)出现认知功能障碍,在术后第30天,48名患者中有11名(23%)出现认知功能障碍。
CEA术后会出现轻微认知衰退,且在术后至少持续数周。对照组未出现这种衰退。