Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术后神经心理功能障碍的对照前瞻性研究。

A controlled prospective study of neuropsychological dysfunction following carotid endarterectomy.

作者信息

Heyer Eric J, Sharma Ruchey, Rampersad Anita, Winfree Christopher J, Mack William J, Solomon Robert A, Todd George J, McCormick Paul C, McMurtry James G, Quest Donald O, Stern Yaakov, Lazar Ronald M, Connolly E Sander

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Arch Neurol. 2002 Feb;59(2):217-22. doi: 10.1001/archneur.59.2.217.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although subtle cognitive injury as revealed by neuropsychological testing occurs in a substantial number of patients following carotid endarterectomy (CEA), there is controversy about whether this finding is a result of the surgery or the anesthesia.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the changes in neuropsychological test performance in patients following CEA vs a control group of patients older than 60 years following spine surgery, so as to determine whether neuropsychological dysfunction after CEA is a result of surgery or anesthesia.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CEA (n = 80) and lumbar spine surgery (n = 25) were assessed with a battery of neuropsychological tests preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 and 30. The neuropsychological performance of patients in the control group was used to normalize performance for patients in the CEA group, by calculating z scores using the mean and SD of the change scores in the control group. Significant cognitive dysfunction was defined as performance that exceeded 2 SDs above the mean performance of patients in the control group.

RESULTS

Postoperative days 1 and 30 total deficit scores were significantly worse in the CEA group compared with the controls. When individual test results were examined, the CEA group performed significantly worse than the controls on the Rey Complex Figure test and Halstead-Reitan Trails B on day 1, and on the Rey Complex Figure on day 30. Overall, cognitive dysfunction was seen in 22 patients (28%) in the CEA group on day 1 and in 11 (23%) of 48 patients on day 30.

CONCLUSIONS

Subtle cognitive decline following CEA occurs and persists for at least several weeks after surgery. This decline was absent in a control group.

摘要

背景

尽管在大量颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的患者中,神经心理学测试显示存在轻微认知损伤,但对于这一发现是手术还是麻醉所致存在争议。

目的

比较CEA患者与60岁以上脊柱手术对照组患者神经心理学测试表现的变化,以确定CEA术后神经心理功能障碍是手术还是麻醉的结果。

方法

对接受CEA的患者(n = 80)和腰椎手术患者(n = 25)在术前以及术后第1天和第30天进行一系列神经心理学测试评估。通过使用对照组变化分数的均值和标准差计算z分数,用对照组患者的神经心理学表现对CEA组患者的表现进行标准化。显著认知功能障碍定义为超过对照组患者平均表现2个标准差以上的表现。

结果

与对照组相比,CEA组术后第1天和第30天的总缺陷分数显著更差。检查个体测试结果时,CEA组在术后第1天的雷氏复杂图形测试和霍尔斯特德-赖坦连线测验B以及术后第30天的雷氏复杂图形测试中的表现显著差于对照组。总体而言,CEA组在术后第1天有22名患者(28%)出现认知功能障碍,在术后第30天,48名患者中有11名(23%)出现认知功能障碍。

结论

CEA术后会出现轻微认知衰退,且在术后至少持续数周。对照组未出现这种衰退。

相似文献

1
A controlled prospective study of neuropsychological dysfunction following carotid endarterectomy.
Arch Neurol. 2002 Feb;59(2):217-22. doi: 10.1001/archneur.59.2.217.
3
Cognitive changes after surgery vs stenting for carotid artery stenosis.
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):691-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.253. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
5
Elevation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in patients experiencing neurocognitive decline following carotid endarterectomy.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008 Aug;150(8):779-84; discussion 784. doi: 10.1007/s00701-008-1618-6. Epub 2008 Jun 23.
7
APOE-epsilon4 predisposes to cognitive dysfunction following uncomplicated carotid endarterectomy.
Neurology. 2005 Dec 13;65(11):1759-63. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000184579.23624.6b. Epub 2005 Oct 5.
9
Subclinical neurocognitive dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy-the impact of shunting.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2010 Jul;22(3):195-201. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181d5e421.
10
Predictors of neurocognitive decline after carotid endarterectomy.
Neurosurgery. 2006 May;58(5):844-50; discussion 844-50. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000209638.62401.7E.

引用本文的文献

2
Carotid revascularization and cognitive impairment: the neglected role of cerebral small vessel disease.
Neurol Sci. 2022 Jan;43(1):139-152. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05629-w. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
4
Long-term cognitive decline and mortality after carotid endarterectomy.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;194:105823. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105823. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
5
Delayed Ipsilateral Regional Cortical Injury after Carotid Endarterectomy.
J Clin Neurol. 2019 Jul;15(3):421-423. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2019.15.3.421.
6
Prediction of Long Term Restenosis Risk After Surgery in the Carotid Bifurcation by Hemodynamic and Geometric Analysis.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2019 Apr;47(4):1129-1140. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02201-8. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
7
Easily Screenable Characteristics Associated with Cognitive Improvement and Dysfunction After Carotid Endarterectomy.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jan;121:e200-e206. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.076. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

本文引用的文献

1
PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDY OF CAROTID OCCLUSION AND ENDARTERECTOMY.
Arch Neurol. 1964 Mar;10:293-7. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1964.00460150063006.
2
Severe pain confounds neuropsychological test performance.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000 Oct;22(5):633-9. doi: 10.1076/1380-3395(200010)22:5;1-9;FT633.
3
Subtle brain damage cannot be detected by measuring neuron-specific enolase and S-100beta protein after carotid endarterectomy.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2000 Apr;14(2):166-70. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(00)90012-0.
4
5
Neuropsychometric changes in patients after carotid endarterectomy.
Stroke. 1998 Jun;29(6):1110-5. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.6.1110.
7
Neuropsychologic effects of carotid endarterectomy.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Dec;19(6):785-94. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403760.
8
Exacerbation or unmasking of focal neurologic deficits by sedatives.
Anesthesiology. 1996 Jul;85(1):21-5; discussion 29A-30A. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199607000-00004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验