Suppr超能文献

欧洲野生动物狂犬病防控的未来会怎样?

What is the future of wildlife rabies control in Europe?

作者信息

Smith G C, Thulke H-H, Fooks A R, Artois M, Macdonald D W, Eisinger D, Selhorst T

机构信息

Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York, UK.

出版信息

Dev Biol (Basel). 2008;131:283-9.

Abstract

Over the last fifteen years or so, classical rabies in terrestrial wildlife has been eliminated from large areas of Western Europe. Over the next few years, terrestrial rabies is likely to occur only east of a line from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea; the overall aim is to eliminate terrestrial rabies from the whole European Union. Elimination of rabies from the less rich countries of Eastern Europe, and the protection of Europe against a resurgence of rabies in the longer term requires modifications to existing OIE and WHO strategies. Here we discuss the options available to eliminate rabies in wildlife while taking account of financial cost, and how to maintain a 'cordon sanitaire' along the eastern boundary of the EU in order to protect the rabies-free areas from rabies incursion. Minimising financial costs at the national level is obviously essential, considering the competing priorities for development and health. This could be achieved either by increasing external funding (for example by the EU) and/or by changing the currently agreed vaccination strategy to reduce costs; any such change must not substantially reduce the chances of rabies elimination. A cordon sanitaire might be placed outside the economic area of the EU, to protect the whole of the EU, or it might be placed within the easternmost countries to ensure logistical consistency of vaccination. Policy must also anticipate an emergency due to rabies breaking out in a previously freed region. Strategic planning may be complicated by the increasing range and abundance of the raccoon dog, an introduced species that is increasingly important as a host for fox rabies. It is argued here that models help to evaluate altemative strategies, exploring options for optimising costs by minimising bait density and frequency or by reducing the vaccination area.

摘要

在过去大约十五年间,西欧大片地区已消除陆生野生动物中的经典狂犬病。在未来几年,陆生狂犬病可能仅在从波罗的海到黑海一线以东出现;总体目标是在整个欧盟消除陆生狂犬病。要在东欧较不富裕的国家消除狂犬病,并从长远角度保护欧洲免受狂犬病卷土重来的威胁,需要对现有世界动物卫生组织(OIE)和世界卫生组织(WHO)的策略进行调整。在此,我们讨论在考虑财务成本的情况下消除野生动物狂犬病的可用选项,以及如何在欧盟东部边界维持“防疫封锁线”,以保护无狂犬病地区免受狂犬病入侵。鉴于发展和卫生方面相互竞争的优先事项,在国家层面将财务成本降至最低显然至关重要。这可以通过增加外部资金(例如由欧盟提供)和/或改变目前商定的疫苗接种策略以降低成本来实现;任何此类改变都不得大幅降低消除狂犬病的几率。防疫封锁线可以设在欧盟经济区之外,以保护整个欧盟,也可以设在最东部国家境内,以确保疫苗接种的后勤一致性。政策还必须预见到先前已消除狂犬病的地区爆发狂犬病的紧急情况。由于作为狐狸狂犬病宿主变得越来越重要的外来物种貉的分布范围和数量不断增加,战略规划可能会变得复杂。本文认为,模型有助于评估替代策略,通过最小化诱饵密度和频率或缩小疫苗接种区域来探索优化成本的选项。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验