Attin Thomas, Schmidlin Patrick R, Wegehaupt Florian, Wiegand Annette
Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dent Mater. 2009 Feb;25(2):143-57. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.010. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
Numerous studies investigated the impact of bleaching procedures on enamel microhardness. The outcomes of these studies reveal inconsistencies regarding the fact whether a microhardness reduction due to bleaching occurs or not. Aim of the present review was to summarize the existing literature of external bleaching therapies, which used microhardness tests for evaluation of possible effects on enamel and to weigh up different parameters of the study designs with respect to the outcome of these studies.
The data from original scientific full papers listed in PubMed or ISI Web of Science (search term: enamel and (bleaching or peroxide) and (hardness or microhardness or Knoop or Vickers)) and received by additional hand-search meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the review. Influences of different parameters on the outcome of the bleaching treatments were analyzed with the Fisher's-exact-test.
A total of 55 studies were identified with 166 hardness measurements conducted directly after bleaching and 69 measurements performed after a post-treatment episode. Directly after bleaching, 84 (51%) treatments showed microhardness reduction compared to baseline, whereas 82 (49%) did not yield microhardness reduction. After the post-treatment episode, 20 (29%) treatments showed hardness reduction and 49 (71%) did not. A significant higher number of bleaching treatments resulting in enamel microhardness reduction were observed, when artificial instead of human saliva was used for storage of the enamel samples in the intervals between the bleaching applications and when no fluoridation measures were applied during or after the bleaching phase.
The review shows that in those studies, which simulated the intraoral conditions as closely as possible, the risk of enamel microhardness decrease due to bleaching treatments seems to be reduced. Nevertheless more in situ- and in vivo-studies are needed to verify this observation.
众多研究探讨了漂白程序对牙釉质显微硬度的影响。这些研究结果在漂白是否会导致显微硬度降低这一问题上存在不一致。本综述的目的是总结外部漂白疗法的现有文献,这些文献使用显微硬度测试来评估对牙釉质可能产生的影响,并根据这些研究的结果权衡研究设计的不同参数。
本综述纳入了在PubMed或ISI科学网中列出的原始科学全文论文(搜索词:牙釉质和(漂白或过氧化物)以及(硬度或显微硬度或努氏硬度或维氏硬度))的数据,以及通过额外的手工检索获得的符合纳入标准的数据。使用Fisher精确检验分析不同参数对漂白治疗结果的影响。
共确定了55项研究,其中166次硬度测量在漂白后立即进行,69次测量在治疗后阶段进行。漂白后立即进行的测量中,与基线相比,84次(51%)治疗显示显微硬度降低,而82次(49%)未出现显微硬度降低。治疗后阶段,20次(29%)治疗显示硬度降低,49次(71%)未降低。当在漂白应用间隔期间使用人工唾液而非人类唾液储存牙釉质样本,以及在漂白阶段期间或之后未采取氟化措施时,观察到导致牙釉质显微硬度降低的漂白治疗数量显著更多。
该综述表明,在那些尽可能模拟口腔内条件的研究中,漂白治疗导致牙釉质显微硬度降低的风险似乎有所降低。然而,仍需要更多的原位和体内研究来验证这一观察结果。