• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维度化的风险:区分负面特质与人格障碍的挑战。

The perils of dimensionalization: challenges in distinguishing negative traits from personality disorders.

作者信息

Wakefield Jerome C

机构信息

New York University, Silver School of Social Work, 1 Washington Square North, New York, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2008 Sep;31(3):379-93, v. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2008.03.009.

DOI:10.1016/j.psc.2008.03.009
PMID:18638641
Abstract

The harmful dysfunction analysis of mental disorder is used to assess whether traits are indicative of personality disorder, and the ways such an inference can go wrong. Personality is an overall organization that allows the organism to accomplish basic goals within the constraints of its basic traits and specific intentional states. Extreme traits can be negative or "dysfunctional" in the sense that they interfere with the achievement of socially or personally valued goals; however, they are not necessarily dysfunctions or disorders in the biological or medical sense. Thus, no sheer assessment of a set of traits can offer sufficient information for a diagnosis of personality disorder. Nor do criteria such as maladaptiveness, impairment, or clinical significance necessarily transform a trait into a personality disorder. The DSM's most plausible suggestion for judging when traits are dysfunctions, inflexibility, is also problematic because many nondisordered traits are inflexible as well.

摘要

精神障碍的有害功能失调分析用于评估某些特质是否表明存在人格障碍,以及这种推断可能出错的方式。人格是一个整体组织,它使有机体能够在其基本特质和特定意向状态的限制范围内实现基本目标。极端特质在干扰社会或个人重视目标的实现这个意义上可能是负面的或“功能失调的”;然而,从生物学或医学意义上来说,它们不一定是功能失调或障碍。因此,仅仅对一组特质进行评估并不能为诊断人格障碍提供足够的信息。诸如适应不良、损害或临床意义等标准也不一定会将一种特质转变为人格障碍。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)关于判断特质何时属于功能失调的最合理建议——僵化,也存在问题,因为许多无紊乱的特质同样也是僵化的。

相似文献

1
The perils of dimensionalization: challenges in distinguishing negative traits from personality disorders.维度化的风险:区分负面特质与人格障碍的挑战。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2008 Sep;31(3):379-93, v. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2008.03.009.
2
Personality disorder as harmful dysfunction: DSM'S cultural deviance criterion reconsidered.作为有害功能障碍的人格障碍:重新审视《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》的文化偏差标准。
J Pers Disord. 2006 Apr;20(2):157-69; discussion 181-5. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2006.20.2.157.
3
DSM axis II: personality disorders or adaptation disorders?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》轴II:人格障碍还是适应性障碍?
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;22(1):111-7. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32831a4763.
4
State and trait in personality disorders.人格障碍中的状态与特质。
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Jan-Mar;19(1):37-44. doi: 10.1080/10401230601163584.
5
Personality structure as an organizing construct.人格结构作为一种组织构建。
J Pers Disord. 2010 Feb;24(1):14-24. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2010.24.1.14.
6
Narcissistic personality disorder and the DSM-V.自恋型人格障碍与 DSM-V
J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 Nov;119(4):640-9. doi: 10.1037/a0019529.
7
An integrative dimensional classification of personality disorder.人格障碍的综合维度分类
Psychol Assess. 2009 Sep;21(3):243-55. doi: 10.1037/a0016606.
8
An empirically-based classification of personality disorder.基于实证的人格障碍分类。
J Pers Disord. 2011 Jun;25(3):397-420. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.397.
9
Should personality traits be considered when refining substance misuse treatment programs?在完善药物滥用治疗方案时,是否应考虑人格特质?
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007 Jan;26(1):17-23. doi: 10.1080/09595230601036952.
10
Using a general model of personality to understand sex differences in the personality disorders.使用人格通用模型来理解人格障碍中的性别差异。
J Pers Disord. 2007 Dec;21(6):583-602. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.6.583.

引用本文的文献

1
Severity in the ICD-11 personality disorder model: Evaluation in a Spanish mixed sample.国际疾病分类第11版人格障碍模型中的严重程度:西班牙混合样本评估。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 9;13:1015489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1015489. eCollection 2022.
2
The Associations Between Maladaptive Personality Traits, Craving, Alcohol Use, and Adolescent Problem Gambling: An Italian Survey Study.适应不良人格特质、渴求感、饮酒与青少年问题性赌博之间的关联:一项意大利调查研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Mar;36(1):243-258. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09872-x.
3
DSM-5, psychiatric epidemiology and the false positives problem.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版、精神科流行病学与假阳性问题
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015 Jun;24(3):188-96. doi: 10.1017/S2045796015000116. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
4
Personality disorder classification: stuck in neutral, how to move forward?人格障碍分类:停滞不前,如何前行?
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014 Oct;16(10):480. doi: 10.1007/s11920-014-0480-x.
5
Three-pronged assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder and its consequences: personality functioning, pathological traits, and psychosocial disability.人格障碍及其后果的三方面评估与诊断:人格功能、病理特质及社会心理残疾。
Personal Disord. 2014 Jan;5(1):55-69. doi: 10.1037/per0000063.
6
The RDoC framework: facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology.RDoC 框架:促进从 ICD/DSM 向整合神经科学和精神病理学的维度方法的转变。
World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):28-35. doi: 10.1002/wps.20087.
7
The interpersonal core of personality pathology.人格病理学的人际核心。
J Pers Disord. 2013 Jun;27(3):270-95. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2013.27.3.270.
8
Qualitative and quantitative distinctions in personality disorder.人格障碍的定性与定量区分。
J Pers Assess. 2011 Jul;93(4):370-9. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.577477.