Lindeman Marjaana, Cederström Sebastian, Simola Petteri, Simula Anni, Ollikainen Sara, Riekki Tapani
University of Helsinki, Finland.
Cortex. 2008 Nov-Dec;44(10):1307-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.07.010. Epub 2008 Jun 14.
A major problem in research on paranormal beliefs is that the concept of "paranormality" remains to be adequately defined. The aim of this study was to empirically justify the following definition: paranormal beliefs are beliefs in physical, biological, or psychological phenomena that contain core ontological attributes of one of the other two categories [e.g., a stone (physical) having thoughts (psychological)]. We hypothesized that individuals who believe in paranormal phenomena are slower in understanding whether sentences with core knowledge violations are literally true than skeptics, and that this difference would be reflected by a more negative N400. Ten believers and 10 skeptics (six men, age range 23-49) participated in the study. Event-related potentials (N400) were recorded as the participants read 210 three-word Finnish sentences, of which 70 were normal ("The house has a history"), 70 were anomalies ("The house writes its history") and 70 included violations of core knowledge ("The house knows its history"). The participants were presented with a question that contextualized the sentences: "Is this sentence literally true?" While the N400 effects were similar for normal and anomalous sentences among the believers and the skeptics, a more negative N400 effect was found among the believers than among the skeptics for sentences with core knowledge violations. The results support the new definition of "paranormality", because participants who believed in paranormal phenomena appeared to find it more difficult to construct a reasonable interpretation of the sentences with core knowledge violations than the skeptics did as indicated by the N400.
超自然信念研究中的一个主要问题是,“超自然”的概念仍有待充分界定。本研究的目的是通过实证来证明以下定义:超自然信念是对物理、生物或心理现象的信念,这些现象包含其他两类现象之一的核心本体属性[例如,一块石头(物理)有思想(心理)]。我们假设,相信超自然现象的个体在理解包含核心知识违背的句子是否字面上为真时比怀疑论者更慢,并且这种差异将通过更负的N400来体现。十名信徒和十名怀疑论者(六名男性,年龄范围23 - 49岁)参与了这项研究。当参与者阅读210个芬兰语三字句子时,记录事件相关电位(N400),其中70个是正常句子(“这所房子有一段历史”),70个是异常句子(“这所房子写下它的历史”),70个包含核心知识违背(“这所房子知道它的历史”)。向参与者提出一个使句子情境化的问题:“这个句子字面上是真的吗?”虽然信徒和怀疑论者中正常句子和异常句子的N400效应相似,但对于包含核心知识违背的句子,信徒中的N400效应比怀疑论者中更负。结果支持了“超自然”的新定义,因为如N400所示,相信超自然现象的参与者似乎比怀疑论者更难对包含核心知识违背的句子构建合理的解释。