• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全基因组关联研究的贝叶斯因子:与P值的比较。

Bayes factors for genome-wide association studies: comparison with P-values.

作者信息

Wakefield Jon

机构信息

Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Box 357232, Seattle, Washington 98195-7232, USA.

出版信息

Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;33(1):79-86. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20359.

DOI:10.1002/gepi.20359
PMID:18642345
Abstract

The Bayes factor is a summary measure that provides an alternative to the P-value for the ranking of associations, or the flagging of associations as "significant". We describe an approximate Bayes factor that is straightforward to use and is appropriate when sample sizes are large. We consider various choices of the prior on the effect size, including those that allow effect size to vary with the minor allele frequency (MAF) of the marker. An important contribution is the description of a specific prior that gives identical rankings between Bayes factors and P-values, providing a link between the two approaches, and allowing the implications of the use of P-values to be more easily understood. As a summary measure of noteworthiness P-values are difficult to calibrate since their interpretation depends on MAF and, crucially, on sample size. A consequence is that a consistent decision-making procedure using P-values requires a threshold for significance that reduces with sample size, contrary to common practice.

摘要

贝叶斯因子是一种汇总度量,它为关联的排序或作为“显著”关联的标记提供了一种替代P值的方法。我们描述了一种近似贝叶斯因子,它易于使用,并且在样本量较大时适用。我们考虑了效应大小先验的各种选择,包括那些允许效应大小随标记的次要等位基因频率(MAF)变化的选择。一个重要的贡献是描述了一种特定的先验,它在贝叶斯因子和P值之间给出相同的排序,在两种方法之间建立了联系,并使P值使用的含义更容易理解。作为值得注意程度的汇总度量,P值难以校准,因为它们的解释取决于MAF,并且至关重要的是取决于样本量。结果是,使用P值的一致决策程序需要一个显著性阈值,该阈值随样本量减小,这与常见做法相反。

相似文献

1
Bayes factors for genome-wide association studies: comparison with P-values.全基因组关联研究的贝叶斯因子:与P值的比较。
Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;33(1):79-86. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20359.
2
Hierarchical Bayes prioritization of marker associations from a genome-wide association scan for further investigation.基于全基因组关联扫描的标记关联分层贝叶斯优先级排序以进行进一步研究。
Genet Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;31(8):871-82. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20248.
3
Reporting and interpretation in genome-wide association studies.全基因组关联研究中的报告与解读。
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;37(3):641-53. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym257. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
4
Bayesian variable and model selection methods for genetic association studies.用于基因关联研究的贝叶斯变量与模型选择方法。
Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;33(1):27-37. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20353.
5
Evaluating the ability of tree-based methods and logistic regression for the detection of SNP-SNP interaction.评估基于树的方法和逻辑回归检测单核苷酸多态性(SNP)-SNP相互作用的能力。
Ann Hum Genet. 2009 May;73(Pt 3):360-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2009.00511.x. Epub 2009 Mar 8.
6
Selection of influential genetic markers among a large number of candidates based on effect estimation rather than hypothesis testing: an approach for genome-wide association studies.基于效应估计而非假设检验从大量候选基因中选择有影响力的遗传标记:一种全基因组关联研究方法
Epidemiology. 2008 Mar;19(2):302-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181632c3d.
7
An optimal dose-effect mode trend test for SNP genotype tables.针对单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因型表的最优剂量-效应模式趋势检验。
Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;33(2):114-27. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20362.
8
Designing a GWAS: power, sample size, and data structure.全基因组关联研究设计:效能、样本量和数据结构。
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1019:37-98. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-447-0_3.
9
Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations.形式统计学显著性对观察性关联可信度的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug 15;168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn156. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
10
Evaluation of potential power gain with imputed genotypes in genome-wide association studies.在全基因组关联研究中使用推算基因型评估潜在的功效增益。
Hum Hered. 2009;68(1):23-34. doi: 10.1159/000210446. Epub 2009 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards improved fine-mapping of candidate causal variants.迈向对候选因果变异更精细的定位。
Nat Rev Genet. 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1038/s41576-025-00869-4.
2
Characterizing aging-related genetic and physiological determinants of spinal curvature.表征脊柱侧弯与衰老相关的遗传和生理决定因素。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Jul 12;5(1):291. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01003-5.
3
Data simulation to optimize frameworks for genome-wide association studies in diverse populations.数据模拟以优化不同人群全基因组关联研究的框架。
Front Genet. 2025 Jun 18;16:1559496. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1559496. eCollection 2025.
4
Genome-wide association meta-analysis of human olfactory identification discovers sex-specific and sex-differential genetic variants.人类嗅觉识别的全基因组关联荟萃分析发现了性别特异性和性别差异性基因变异。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 1;16(1):5434. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61330-y.
5
Genome-Wide Insights into the Genes and Pathways Shaping Human Foveal Development.全基因组视角下塑造人类中央凹发育的基因与通路
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 20:2025.06.18.25329836. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.18.25329836.
6
Exploring Similarities and Differences Between Methods That Exploit Patterns of Local Genetic Correlation to Identify Shared Causal Loci Through Application to Genome-Wide Association Studies of Multiple Long Term Conditions.通过应用于多种长期病症的全基因组关联研究,探索利用局部遗传相关性模式来识别共享因果位点的方法之间的异同。
Genet Epidemiol. 2025 Jul;49(5):e70012. doi: 10.1002/gepi.70012.
7
BAYESIAN VARIABLE SELECTION IN A COX PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL WITH THE "SUM OF SINGLE EFFECTS" PRIOR.具有“单效应之和”先验的Cox比例风险模型中的贝叶斯变量选择
ArXiv. 2025 Jun 6:arXiv:2506.06233v1.
8
Decision Rules in Frequentist and Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: P-Value and Bayes Factor.频率主义和贝叶斯假设检验中的决策规则:P值和贝叶斯因子。
Int J Public Health. 2025 May 14;70:1608258. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1608258. eCollection 2025.
9
Single cell multiomics and 3D genome architecture reveal novel pathways of human heart failure.单细胞多组学与三维基因组结构揭示人类心力衰竭的新途径。
medRxiv. 2025 May 9:2025.05.08.25327176. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.08.25327176.
10
Single-cell multiome and spatial profiling reveals pancreas cell type-specific gene regulatory programs driving type 1 diabetes progression.单细胞多组学和空间分析揭示了驱动1型糖尿病进展的胰腺细胞类型特异性基因调控程序。
bioRxiv. 2025 Mar 17:2025.02.13.637721. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.13.637721.