Litt Dana, Dodge Tonya
The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, United States.
Body Image. 2008 Dec;5(4):346-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
The present study was designed to examine the predictive validity of the Drive for Muscularity Scale (DMS; McCreary & Sasse, 2000). The drive for muscularity scale (DMS) is comprised of two subscales: a muscularity-oriented body image (MBI) subscale and a muscularity behavior (MB) subscale. The present study tested whether these subscales predicted two behavioral outcomes in the context of a longitudinal design: use of performance enhancing substances (PES) and weightlifting behavior. One hundred and sixty-one male undergraduates completed a questionnaire that assessed the drive for muscularity, PES use and weightlifting behavior at Time 1 and again 6 weeks later. Results indicated that the MB subscale at Time 1 significantly predicted both changes in PES use and weightlifting behavior controlling for past substance use and past weightlifting behavior. The MBI subscale failed to predict either changes in PES use or weightlifting behavior. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
本研究旨在检验肌肉增强驱力量表(DMS;麦克里里和萨斯,2000年)的预测效度。肌肉增强驱力量表(DMS)由两个子量表组成:一个以肌肉增强为导向的身体意象(MBI)子量表和一个肌肉增强行为(MB)子量表。本研究在纵向设计的背景下测试了这些子量表是否能预测两种行为结果:使用性能增强物质(PES)和举重行为。161名男性本科生完成了一份问卷,该问卷在第1次评估了肌肉增强驱力、PES使用情况和举重行为,6周后再次进行评估。结果表明,第1次时的MB子量表在控制过去物质使用情况和过去举重行为的条件下,能显著预测PES使用情况和举重行为的变化。MBI子量表未能预测PES使用情况或举重行为的变化。文中讨论了研究的意义和未来研究的方向。