Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5 Fu-Shin Street, Kweishan, Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 22;11(1):14968. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94361-8.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is not always successful even with needle knife precut sphincterotomy (NKPS). How to manage these patients with initial NKPS failure has not been well studied. We report the outcomes of patients who received endoscopic and non-endoscopic rescue treatment after the initial NKPS failure. During the 15 years from 2004 to 2018, 87 patients with initial NKPS failure received interval endoscopic treatment (IET group, n = 43), percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD group, n = 25), or bile duct surgery (BDS group, n = 19) were retrospectively studied. Compared with the PTBD group, the prevalence of choledocholithiasis was higher (69.8% vs. 16.0%, p < 0.001), and malignant bile duct stricture were lower (20.9% vs. 76.0%, p < 0.001) in the IET group. Furthermore, the IET group had a significantly longer time interval between the first and second treatment procedures (4 days vs. 2 days, p = 0.001), a lower technique success rate (79.1% vs. 100%, p = 0.021), and a shorter length of hospital stay (7 days vs. 18 days, p < 0.001). Compared to the BDS group, the only significant finding was that the patients in the IET group were older. Although not statistically significant, the complication rate was lowest in the IET group (7.0%) while highest in the BDS group (15.8%). Complications in the IET group were also mild, as compared with the other two groups. In conclusion, IET should be considered after initial failed NKPS for deep biliary cannulation before contemplating more invasive treatment such as BDS. PTBD may be the alternative therapy for patients with malignant biliary obstruction.
经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)即使在使用针刀预切开括约肌切开术(NKPS)后也并非总是成功。对于初始 NKPS 失败的这些患者,如何进行管理尚未得到很好的研究。我们报告了初始 NKPS 失败后接受内镜和非内镜救援治疗的患者的结局。在 2004 年至 2018 年的 15 年间,回顾性研究了 87 例初始 NKPS 失败后接受间隔内镜治疗(IET 组,n=43)、经皮经肝胆管引流(PTBD 组,n=25)或胆管手术(BDS 组,n=19)的患者。与 PTBD 组相比,IET 组的胆总管结石患病率更高(69.8%比 16.0%,p<0.001),恶性胆管狭窄患病率更低(20.9%比 76.0%,p<0.001)。此外,IET 组第一次和第二次治疗程序之间的时间间隔明显更长(4 天比 2 天,p=0.001),技术成功率更低(79.1%比 100%,p=0.021),住院时间更短(7 天比 18 天,p<0.001)。与 BDS 组相比,唯一显著的发现是 IET 组的患者年龄较大。尽管没有统计学意义,但 IET 组的并发症发生率最低(7.0%),而 BDS 组最高(15.8%)。与其他两组相比,IET 组的并发症也较轻。总之,在考虑更具侵袭性的治疗方法(如 BDS)之前,对于深胆管插管,应在初始 NKPS 失败后考虑进行 IET。对于恶性胆道梗阻的患者,PTBD 可能是替代治疗方法。