Burlingame R W, Rubin R L
Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Research Institute of Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California 92037.
J Clin Invest. 1991 Aug;88(2):680-90. doi: 10.1172/JCI115353.
Increasing evidence suggests that autoantibodies in the rheumatic diseases are a consequence of immune selection by self-material, but the nature of the in vivo immunogen is unknown. Insight into this problem may be obtained by measuring autoantibody binding to various forms of a target antigen. Antihistone antibodies arising as a side effect of therapy with various drugs offer an opportunity to explore this premise because many forms of histone have been characterized and adapted to ELISA formats. Two patterns of antibody reactivity were observed. All 21 patients with symptomatic procainamide-induced lupus and 7 of 12 patients with quinidine-induced lupus had IgG antibodies reacting predominantly with the (H2A-H2B)-DNA complex and with chromatin. In contrast, antibodies in 19 of 24 patients taking procainamide without accompanying lupus-like symptoms did not show any pattern. The second pattern was observed in 18/19 chlorpromazine-treated patients and 14/17 patients with hydralazine-induced lupus in which IgM antibodies displayed more reactivity with DNA-free histones than with the corresponding histone-DNA complexes and almost no binding to H1-stripped chromatin. Absorption studies were entirely consistent with these results. Thus, the two patterns of reactivity with nucleosomal components reflect the molecular substructure of chromatin, suggesting that two processes underlie antihistone antibody induction by drugs. In one, IgG autoantibodies appear to be elicited by chromatin, whereas in the other, autoimmune tolerance to native chromatin appears largely intact, and IgM antibodies may be driven by DNA-free histone.
越来越多的证据表明,风湿性疾病中的自身抗体是自身物质进行免疫选择的结果,但体内免疫原的性质尚不清楚。通过测量自身抗体与各种形式的靶抗原的结合情况,可能会深入了解这个问题。作为各种药物治疗的副作用而产生的抗组蛋白抗体为探索这一前提提供了机会,因为许多形式的组蛋白已被鉴定并适用于酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)形式。观察到两种抗体反应模式。所有21例有症状的普鲁卡因胺诱发的狼疮患者以及12例奎尼丁诱发的狼疮患者中的7例,其IgG抗体主要与(H2A-H2B)-DNA复合物和染色质发生反应。相比之下,24例服用普鲁卡因胺但无狼疮样症状的患者中,有19例患者的抗体未显示出任何反应模式。在18/19例接受氯丙嗪治疗的患者和14/17例肼苯哒嗪诱发的狼疮患者中观察到第二种反应模式,其中IgM抗体与不含DNA的组蛋白的反应性高于与相应的组蛋白-DNA复合物的反应性,并且几乎不与去除H1的染色质结合。吸收研究与这些结果完全一致。因此,与核小体成分的两种反应模式反映了染色质的分子亚结构,表明药物诱导抗组蛋白抗体的过程有两个。在一个过程中,IgG自身抗体似乎是由染色质引发的,而在另一个过程中,对天然染色质的自身免疫耐受性在很大程度上保持完整,IgM抗体可能由不含DNA的组蛋白驱动。