Yiu Cynthia K Y, Hiraishi Noriko, King Nigel M, Tay Franklin R
Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong SAR, China.
J Adhes Dent. 2008 Jun;10(3):173-82.
This study examined the effects of cutting dentin with different burs at various speeds on the microtensile bond strength (muTBS) of two self-etching adhesive systems.
Flat deep dentin surfaces from 50 extracted human third molars were divided into 5 groups (n = 10) according to bur type and speed of rotation: (I) high-speed diamond bur, (II) low-speed diamond bur, (III) high-speed tungsten carbide bur, (IV) low-speed tungsten carbide bur. Controls were abraded with 600-grit SiC paper. A two-step self-etching adhesive, Clearfil SE Bond (SE, Kuraray) and a one-step self-etching adhesive, Clearfil S3 Bond (S3, Kuraray) were applied to dentin surfaces and light cured. Composite buildups were performed using Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE). For lTBS evaluation, composite-dentin beams of 0.8 mm2 were stressed to failure at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The muTBS data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison tests. Representative fractured beams from each group were prepared for fractographic analysis under SEM.
Two-way ANOVA showed that the effects of dentin surface preparations, adhesive systems, and their interaction were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The muTBS was the highest when bonding SE to dentin surface prepared with 600-grit SiC abrasive paper (47.3 +/- 7.4 MPa), followed by high-speed tungsten carbide burs (40.8 +/- 6.1 MPa), and the lowest when bonding S3 to dentin surfaces prepared with a high-speed diamond bur (15.2 +/- 6.2 MPa). SEM observation of the fractured surfaces revealed mixed and adhesive failures for SE groups, while in the S3 groups, adhesive failures predominated with numerous inclusion droplets.
Higher bond strengths are achieved with SE bond when applied on dentin surfaces prepared with tungsten carbide burs. Proper bur and adhesive selection are essential to optimize dentin adhesion of self-etching adhesives.
本研究考察了使用不同车针在不同速度下切割牙本质对两种自酸蚀粘结系统微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)的影响。
从50颗拔除的人类第三磨牙获取平坦的深层牙本质表面,根据车针类型和旋转速度分为5组(n = 10):(I)高速金刚石车针,(II)低速金刚石车针,(III)高速碳化钨车针,(IV)低速碳化钨车针。对照组用600目碳化硅砂纸打磨。将两步法自酸蚀粘结剂Clearfil SE Bond(SE,可乐丽)和一步法自酸蚀粘结剂Clearfil S3 Bond(S3,可乐丽)应用于牙本质表面并光固化。使用Filtek Z250(3M ESPE)进行复合树脂充填。为评估μTBS,将0.8 mm2的复合树脂 - 牙本质梁以1 mm/min的十字头速度加载至破坏。μTBS数据采用双向方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验进行分析。每组代表性的断裂梁制备后用于扫描电镜下的断口分析。
双向方差分析显示,牙本质表面处理、粘结系统及其相互作用的影响具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。当将SE粘结到用600目碳化硅砂纸制备的牙本质表面时,μTBS最高(47.3±7.4 MPa),其次是高速碳化钨车针(40.8±6.1 MPa),而将S3粘结到用高速金刚石车针制备的牙本质表面时最低(15.2±6.2 MPa)。断口表面的扫描电镜观察显示,SE组为混合破坏和粘结破坏,而S3组以粘结破坏为主,有大量夹杂液滴。
当SE粘结剂应用于用碳化钨车针制备的牙本质表面时可获得更高的粘结强度。正确选择车针和粘结剂对于优化自酸蚀粘结剂与牙本质的粘结至关重要。