Grindrod Christopher M, Bilenko Natalia Y, Myers Emily B, Blumstein Sheila E
Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 South Sixth Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Brain Res. 2008 Sep 10;1229:167-78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Jul 12.
Recent research suggests that the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) plays a role in selecting semantic information from among competing alternatives. A key question remains as to whether the LIFG is engaged by the selection of semantic information only or by increased semantic competition in and of itself, especially when such competition is implicit in nature. Ambiguous words presented in a lexical context provide a means of examining whether the LIFG is recruited under conditions when contextual cues constrain selection to only the meaning appropriate to the context (e.g., coin-mint-money) or under conditions of increased competition when contextual cues do not allow for the resolution to a particular meaning (e.g., candy-mint-money). In this event-related fMRI study, an implicit task was used in which subjects made lexical (i.e., word/nonword) decisions on the third stimulus of auditorily presented triplets in conditions where the lexical context either promoted resolution toward a particular ambiguous word meaning or enhanced the competition among ambiguous word meanings. LIFG activation was observed when the context allowed for the resolution of competition and hence the selection of one meaning (e.g., coin-mint-money) but failed to emerge when competition between the meanings of an ambiguous word was unresolved by the context (e.g., candy-mint-money). In the latter case, there was a pattern of reduced activation in frontal, temporal and parietal areas. These findings demonstrate that selection or resolution of competition as opposed to increased semantic competition alone engages the LIFG. Moreover, they extend previous work in showing that the LIFG is recruited even in cases where the selection of meaning takes place implicitly.
最近的研究表明,左下额叶回(LIFG)在从相互竞争的选项中选择语义信息方面发挥着作用。一个关键问题仍然存在,即LIFG是仅由语义信息的选择所激活,还是其本身因语义竞争加剧而被激活,尤其是当这种竞争本质上是隐性的时候。在词汇语境中呈现的歧义词语提供了一种方法,用于检验LIFG是在语境线索将选择限制在仅适合该语境的意义(例如,硬币 - 薄荷糖 - 金钱)的条件下被激活,还是在语境线索无法确定特定意义从而竞争加剧的条件下(例如,糖果 - 薄荷糖 - 金钱)被激活。在这项事件相关功能磁共振成像研究中,使用了一项隐性任务,即让受试者在听觉呈现的三联词的第三个刺激上做出词汇(即单词/非单词)判断,此时词汇语境要么促进对特定歧义词语义的解析,要么增强歧义词语义之间的竞争。当语境能够解决竞争从而选择一种意义时(例如,硬币 - 薄荷糖 - 金钱),观察到LIFG激活,但当语境无法解决歧义词语义之间的竞争时(例如,糖果 - 薄荷糖 - 金钱),LIFG激活并未出现。在后一种情况下,额叶、颞叶和顶叶区域存在激活减少的模式。这些发现表明,与单纯的语义竞争加剧相反,竞争的选择或解决会激活LIFG。此外,这些发现扩展了先前的研究工作,表明即使在意义选择隐性发生的情况下,LIFG也会被激活。