Suppr超能文献

普通肝素给药与非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的大出血风险

Unfractionated heparin dosing and risk of major bleeding in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

作者信息

Melloni Chiara, Alexander Karen P, Chen Anita Y, Newby L Kristin, Roe Matthew T, Allen LaPointe Nancy M, Pollack Charles V, Gibler W Brian, Ohman E Magnus, Peterson Eric D

机构信息

Division of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2008 Aug;156(2):209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.03.023. Epub 2008 Jun 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is a mainstay of treatment for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS), but the practice of weight-adjusted bolus and infusion dosing has not been carefully evaluated.

METHODS

Using data from 31,445 high-risk patients with NSTE ACS enrolled at 420 hospitals in the CRUSADE initiative, we evaluated initial UFH dosing relative to guideline recommendations and determined factors associated with excess weight-adjusted dosing and major bleeding, overall and among subgroups. Excess dose was defined as >70 U/kg for bolus or >15 U/kg per hour for infusion.

RESULTS

The most frequent bolus dose was 5,000 U (42.7%) and infusion dose was 1,000 U/h (46%). An excess weight-adjusted UFH bolus or infusion dose was administered 35% of the time. Factors strongly associated with excess weight-adjusted dosing were age (per 10-year increase) (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% CI 1.08-1.15) and female sex (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.33-1.59). Rate of major bleeding increased proportionally in relation to dose of UFH for both bolus and infusion, specifically when dose was above the recommended weight-adjusted range (>70 U/kg for bolus or >15 U/kg per hour for infusion). Both excess bolus (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06) and infusion (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28) were individually associated with increased bleeding. The relationship between weight-adjusted UFH dose and major bleeding did not vary independently by sex or age.

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk patients with NSTE ACS, initial UFH bolus and infusion dosing were frequently higher than recommended weight-adjusted ranges, particularly in patients with lower body weight. Excess bolus and infusion rate dosing was associated with more bleeding and was common among elderly and females. Attention to dosing by weight rather than standard bolus and infusion dosing should lead to improved safety in the use of UFH.

摘要

背景

普通肝素(UFH)是非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE ACS)患者治疗的主要药物,但体重调整推注和输注给药的实践尚未得到仔细评估。

方法

利用CRUSADE倡议中420家医院登记的31445例高危NSTE ACS患者的数据,我们评估了初始UFH给药相对于指南建议的情况,并确定了与超重调整剂量和大出血相关的因素,包括总体情况和亚组情况。过量剂量定义为推注>70 U/kg或输注>15 U/kg每小时。

结果

最常见的推注剂量为5000 U(42.7%),输注剂量为1000 U/h(46%)。35%的时间给予了超重调整的UFH推注或输注剂量。与超重调整剂量密切相关的因素是年龄(每增加10岁)(比值比[OR]1.11,95%可信区间1.08 - 1.15)和女性(OR 1.45,95%可信区间1.33 - 1.59)。推注和输注时,大出血发生率与UFH剂量成比例增加,特别是当剂量高于推荐的体重调整范围时(推注>70 U/kg或输注>15 U/kg每小时)。过量推注(OR 1.03,95%可信区间1.00 - 1.06)和输注(OR 1.16, 95%可信区间1.05 - 1.28)均与出血增加独立相关。体重调整的UFH剂量与大出血之间的关系在性别或年龄方面没有独立差异。

结论

在高危NSTE ACS患者中,初始UFH推注和输注剂量经常高于推荐的体重调整范围,尤其是体重较低的患者。过量推注和输注速率给药与更多出血相关,在老年人和女性中很常见。关注按体重给药而非标准推注和输注给药应能提高UFH使用的安全性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验