• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性肾病患者照料者的支持干预措施:一项系统综述

Support interventions for caregivers of people with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.

作者信息

Tong Allison, Sainsbury Peter, Craig Jonathan C

机构信息

NHMRC Centre for Clinical Research Excellence in Renal Medicine, Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Dec;23(12):3960-5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn415. Epub 2008 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfn415
PMID:18658178
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A growing number of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) rely on non-professional healthcare providers, such as family and friends, to manage their long-term condition throughout the trajectory of CKD. These informal caregivers can experience stress, depression, lack of confidence and poor quality of life. Yet, the needs of caregivers are often neglected and under-prioritized. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at providing support to caregivers of people with CKD.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of studies that evaluated any intervention for informal caregivers of CKD patients. We searched five electronic databases (up to January Week 5, 2008) including Medline, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register and reference lists of relevant articles.

RESULTS

Three studies were identified that evaluated an intervention for caregivers of CKD patients. All three only assessed the effect of educational material on caregivers' knowledge. Two evaluated information provided to caregivers of dialysis patients using a pre- and post-test study design. The other study used participatory action research methods to develop and evaluate an information handbook for transplant patients and their caregivers. Studies consistently found that the provision of information improved caregivers' knowledge. No other outcomes were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the growing recognition of the burden and adverse effects of CKD on caregivers, no high-quality evidence is available about the effect of information or support interventions on the physical or psychosocial well-being of informal caregivers and the patients. More attention towards the development and evaluation of services that respond to the support and informational needs of caregivers is needed, and this may also lead to improved outcomes for patients.

摘要

背景

越来越多的慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者依靠非专业医疗服务提供者,如家人和朋友,在CKD病程中管理其长期病情。这些非正式护理人员可能会经历压力、抑郁、信心不足和生活质量低下的情况。然而,护理人员的需求往往被忽视且未得到优先重视。本综述的目的是评估旨在为CKD患者护理人员提供支持的干预措施的有效性。

方法

我们对评估针对CKD患者非正式护理人员的任何干预措施的研究进行了系统综述。我们检索了五个电子数据库(截至2008年第5周),包括医学索引数据库(Medline)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、心理学文摘数据库(PsychINFO)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、考克兰系统评价数据库(Cochrane Central Register)以及相关文章的参考文献列表。

结果

共确定了三项评估针对CKD患者护理人员干预措施的研究。所有三项研究均仅评估了教育材料对护理人员知识的影响。两项研究采用前后测试研究设计,评估了向透析患者护理人员提供的信息。另一项研究使用参与式行动研究方法,为移植患者及其护理人员开发并评估了一本信息手册。研究一致发现,提供信息可提高护理人员的知识水平。未报告其他结果。

结论

尽管人们越来越认识到CKD对护理人员的负担和不良影响,但关于信息或支持干预措施对非正式护理人员和患者的身体或心理社会福祉的影响,尚无高质量证据。需要更多关注开发和评估能够满足护理人员支持和信息需求的服务,这也可能改善患者的结局。

相似文献

1
Support interventions for caregivers of people with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.慢性肾病患者照料者的支持干预措施:一项系统综述
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Dec;23(12):3960-5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn415. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
2
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
5
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
6
Early palliative interventions for improving outcomes in people with a primary malignant brain tumour and their carers.早期姑息治疗干预对改善原发性脑恶性肿瘤患者及其照护者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 6;1(1):CD013440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013440.pub2.
7
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
8
Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers.为脑卒中幸存者及其照护者提供信息。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 23;11(11):CD001919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001919.pub4.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
Peer support interventions for parents and carers of children with complex needs.针对有复杂需求的儿童的父母和照顾者的同伴支持干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 20;12(12):CD010618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010618.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Caregiver Burden in Kidney Failure: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties of Instruments.评估肾衰竭患者照顾者的负担:测量工具特性的系统评价
Kidney Med. 2025 Jun 24;7(9):101054. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2025.101054. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Predictors of quality of life among caregivers of patients with moderate to severe kidney disease: an Australian cross-sectional study.中重度肾病患者照料者生活质量的预测因素:一项澳大利亚横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Dec 18;22(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02317-z.
3
Virtual reality-guided mindfulness intervention to enhance psychosocial well-being in caregivers of end-stage kidney disease patients: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot randomised controlled trial.
虚拟现实引导正念干预对终末期肾病患者照顾者心理社会健康的影响:一项混合方法试点随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 22;14(10):e090550. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090550.
4
Medication management during risk of dehydration: A qualitative study among elderly patients with impaired renal function and informal caregivers.在脱水风险期间的药物管理:一项针对肾功能受损的老年患者和非正规照护者的定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2413097. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2413097. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
5
Exploring the unmet needs and experiences of informal caregivers of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) receiving haemodialysis - a qualitative study.探索接受血液透析的终末期肾病(ESKD)患者的非正式照护者的未满足需求和体验 - 一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0302525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302525. eCollection 2024.
6
Priorities for peer support delivery among adults living with chronic kidney disease: a patient-oriented consensus workshop.慢性肾脏病成年患者同伴支持服务的优先事项:以患者为导向的共识研讨会
CMAJ Open. 2023 Aug 15;11(4):E736-E744. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220171. Print 2023 Jul-Aug.
7
Informal Caregiving Networks of Older Adults With Dementia Superimposed on Multimorbidity: A Social Network Analysis Study.患有多种疾病的老年痴呆症患者的非正式照料网络:一项社会网络分析研究。
Innov Aging. 2023 Apr 17;7(4):igad033. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad033. eCollection 2023.
8
Cognitive behavioural therapy self-help intervention preferences among informal caregivers of adults with chronic kidney disease: an online cross-sectional survey.认知行为疗法自助干预在慢性肾脏病成年患者非专业照护者中的偏好:一项在线横断面调查。
BMC Nephrol. 2023 Jan 4;24(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-03052-7.
9
Care of the pediatric patient on chronic peritoneal dialysis.儿科慢性腹膜透析患者的护理。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2022 Dec;37(12):3043-3055. doi: 10.1007/s00467-022-05605-2. Epub 2022 May 19.
10
'It's the empathy'-defining a role for peer support among people living with chronic kidney disease: a qualitative study.“这是同理心”——在慢性肾脏病患者中定义同伴支持的角色:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 12;12(5):e057518. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057518.