Munch-Hansen Torsten, Wieclaw Joanna, Agerbo Esben, Westergaard-Nielsen Niels, Bonde Jens Peter
Department of Occupational Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
BMC Public Health. 2008 Aug 1;8:270. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-270.
Attempts to identify particular aspects of psychosocial work conditions as predictors of sickness absence remain inconclusive. A global measure has previously been suggested to be an efficient way to measure psychosocial work conditions in questionnaires. This paper investigates whether satisfaction with specific aspects of psychosocial work conditions explains sickness absence beyond its association with a global measure of psychosocial work conditions.
The participants were 13,437 employees from 698 public service workplaces in Aarhus County, Denmark. 33 items from a questionnaire fell in groupings around six aspects of psychosocial work conditions: skill discretion, professionalism, management, decision authority, workload and cooperation. A global measure rating satisfaction with psychosocial work conditions on a scale from 0 to 10 was also included in the questionnaire. Individual ratings were aggregated to workplace scores. Analysis of variance and multiple linear regression was used to compare the average number of days of yearly sickness absence with different levels of satisfaction with six aspects of psychosocial work conditions. The covariates included were gender, age, occupation, size of workplace, contact to hospital, civil status and children below 13 living at home.
Dissatisfaction with each of the six aspects of psychosocial work conditions was associated with an increase in sickness absence. When all aspects were simultaneously included in the model, only skill discretion and professionalism were negatively associated with sickness absence. When a global measure of satisfaction with psychosocial work conditions was also included in the model none of the specific aspects showed a statistically significant association with sickness absence.
Low global satisfaction with psychosocial work conditions is associated with increased levels of sickness absence. Including specific aspects of psychosocial work conditions in the model does not provide further information regarding the nature of this association.
试图确定心理社会工作条件的特定方面作为病假预测因素的研究尚无定论。此前有人提出,一项综合指标是在问卷中衡量心理社会工作条件的有效方法。本文探讨对心理社会工作条件特定方面的满意度是否能在与心理社会工作条件综合指标的关联之外,解释病假情况。
参与者为丹麦奥胡斯郡698个公共服务工作场所的13437名员工。问卷中的33个项目围绕心理社会工作条件的六个方面分组:技能自主性、专业性、管理、决策权、工作量和合作。问卷中还包括一项对心理社会工作条件满意度的综合评分,范围从0到10分。个人评分汇总为工作场所得分。采用方差分析和多元线性回归,比较对心理社会工作条件六个方面不同满意度水平下的年度病假平均天数。纳入的协变量包括性别、年龄、职业、工作场所规模、与医院的接触情况、婚姻状况以及家中13岁以下子女情况。
对心理社会工作条件六个方面中任何一个方面的不满都与病假增加有关。当所有方面同时纳入模型时,只有技能自主性和专业性与病假呈负相关。当模型中也纳入对心理社会工作条件满意度的综合指标时,没有任何一个特定方面与病假显示出统计学上的显著关联。
对心理社会工作条件的总体低满意度与病假水平升高有关。在模型中纳入心理社会工作条件的特定方面,并不能提供关于这种关联性质的更多信息。