Wong Jason H, Peterson Matthew S, Thompson James C
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):719-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.006.
The capacity of visual working memory was examined when complex objects from different categories were remembered. Previous studies have not examined how visual similarity affects object memory, though it has long been known that similar-sounding phonological information interferes with rehearsal in auditory working memory. Here, experiments required memory for two or four objects. Memory capacity was compared between remembering four objects from a single object category to remembering four objects from two different categories. Two-category sets led to increased memory capacity only when upright faces were included. Capacity for face-only sets never exceeded their nonface counterparts, and the advantage for two-category sets when faces were one of the categories disappeared when inverted faces were used. These results suggest that two-category sets which include faces are advantaged in working memory but that faces alone do not lead to a memory capacity advantage.
当记忆来自不同类别的复杂物体时,对视觉工作记忆的容量进行了检查。以往的研究尚未考察视觉相似性如何影响物体记忆,尽管人们早就知道,发音相似的语音信息会干扰听觉工作记忆中的复述。在这里,实验要求记忆两个或四个物体。比较了从单个物体类别中记忆四个物体与从两个不同类别中记忆四个物体时的记忆容量。只有当包含直立面孔时,两类物体组才会导致记忆容量增加。仅面孔组的容量从未超过非面孔组,并且当使用倒置面孔时,当面孔是类别之一时两类物体组的优势就消失了。这些结果表明,包含面孔的两类物体组在工作记忆中具有优势,但仅面孔本身并不会导致记忆容量优势。