Williamson Laura
School of Law, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK Email:
Clin Ethics. 2007 Dec 1;2(4):187-192. doi: 10.1258/147775007783560184.
The need to evaluate the performance of clinical ethics services is widely acknowledged although work in this area is more developed in the United States. In the USA many studies that assess clinical ethics services have utilized empirical methods and assessment criteria. The value of these approaches is thought to rest on their ability to measure the value of services in a demonstrable fashion. However, empirical measures tend to lack ethical content, making their contribution to developments in ethical governance unclear. The steady increase of clinical ethics committees in the UK must be accompanied by efforts to evaluate their performance. As part of this evaluative work it is important to examine how the practice of clinical ethics committees can be informed by empirical measures.
尽管在美国这一领域的工作更为发达,但评估临床伦理服务绩效的必要性已得到广泛认可。在美国,许多评估临床伦理服务的研究都采用了实证方法和评估标准。这些方法的价值被认为取决于它们以可证明的方式衡量服务价值的能力。然而,实证措施往往缺乏伦理内容,这使得它们对伦理治理发展的贡献尚不明朗。英国临床伦理委员会数量的稳步增加必须伴随着对其绩效进行评估的努力。作为这项评估工作的一部分,审视实证措施如何为临床伦理委员会的实践提供信息非常重要。