Creaby Mark W, Dixon Sharon J
Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, School of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Sep;40(9):1669-74. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817571ae.
The role of applied external loads in tibial stress fracture is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the magnitude and angle of frontal and sagittal force vectors and the magnitude of the free moment of ground reaction force (the torsional moment between the foot and the ground) during running gait differ between military recruits with and without a history of tibial stress fracture.
Ten male military recruits with tibial stress fracture history and 20 matched controls performed shod running trials over a force plate. The magnitude and the direction of the frontal and sagittal plane ground reaction force, in addition to the free moment, were compared between the groups.
The frontal plane force vector was directed significantly more medially in the stress fracture group during midstance and late stance (P < 0.05). The magnitude of frontal and sagittal plane ground reaction forces and the free moment were not higher in the stress fracture group compared with controls.
These data highlight differences in the direction with which external forces in the frontal plane are applied in military recruits with a history of tibial stress fracture. These differences may be important in the development of the injury.
外界施加的负荷在胫骨应力性骨折中所起的作用尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定有和没有胫骨应力性骨折病史的新兵在跑步步态期间,额状面和矢状面力矢量的大小和角度以及地面反作用力的自由力矩(脚与地面之间的扭矩)是否存在差异。
10名有胫骨应力性骨折病史的男性新兵和20名匹配的对照组在测力板上进行了穿鞋跑步试验。比较了两组之间额状面和矢状面地面反作用力的大小和方向以及自由力矩。
在支撑中期和支撑后期,应力性骨折组的额状面力矢量明显更偏向内侧(P < 0.05)。与对照组相比,应力性骨折组的额状面和矢状面地面反作用力的大小以及自由力矩并不更高。
这些数据突出了有胫骨应力性骨折病史的新兵在额状面施加外力的方向上存在差异。这些差异可能在损伤的发生中起重要作用。