Clarke William L, Anderson Stacey, Kovatchev Boris
Department of Pediatrics, Box 800386, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2008 Aug;4(3):193-9. doi: 10.2174/157339908785294389.
Continuous Glucose Sensors (CGS) generate rich and informative continuous data streams which have the potential to improve the glycemic condition of the patient with diabetes. Such data are critical to the development of closed loop systems for automated glycemic control. Thus the numerical and clinical accuracy of such must be assured. Although numerical point accuracy of these systems has been described using traditional statistics, there are no requirements, as of yet, for determining and reporting the rate (trend) accuracy of the data generated. In addition, little attention has been paid to the clinical accuracy. of these systems. Continuous Glucose-Error Grid Analysis (CG-EGA) is the only method currently available for assessing the clinical accuracy of such data and reporting this accuracy for each of the relevant glycemic ranges, - hypoglycemia, euglycemia, hyperglycemia. This manuscript reviews the development of the original Error Grid Analysis (EGA) and describes its inadequacies when used to determine point accuracy of CGS systems. The development of CG-EGA as a logical extension of EGA for use with CGS is described in detail and examples of how it can be used to describe the clinical accuracy of several CGS are shown. Information is presented on how to obtain assistance with the use of CG-EGA.
连续血糖传感器(CGS)可生成丰富且信息量大的连续数据流,这些数据流有潜力改善糖尿病患者的血糖状况。此类数据对于开发用于自动血糖控制的闭环系统至关重要。因此,必须确保此类数据的数值准确性和临床准确性。尽管已使用传统统计方法描述了这些系统的数值点准确性,但截至目前,对于确定和报告所生成数据的速率(趋势)准确性尚无要求。此外,对这些系统的临床准确性关注甚少。连续血糖误差网格分析(CG - EGA)是目前唯一可用于评估此类数据临床准确性并针对每个相关血糖范围(低血糖、血糖正常、高血糖)报告该准确性的方法。本文回顾了原始误差网格分析(EGA)的发展,并描述了其用于确定CGS系统点准确性时的不足之处。详细介绍了作为EGA与CGS配合使用的逻辑扩展的CG - EGA的发展,并展示了如何使用它来描述几种CGS临床准确性的示例。还介绍了如何在使用CG - EGA方面获得帮助的相关信息。