Suppr超能文献

评估连续血糖监测设备的临床准确性:其他方法。

Evaluating clinical accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring devices: other methods.

作者信息

Wentholt Iris M E, Hart August A, Hoekstra Joost B L, DeVries J Hans

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Curr Diabetes Rev. 2008 Aug;4(3):200-6. doi: 10.2174/157339908785294424.

Abstract

With more and more continuous glucose monitoring devices entering the market, the importance of adequate accuracy assessment grows. This review discusses pros and cons of Regression Analysis and Correlation Coefficient, Relative Difference measures, Bland Altman plot, ISO criteria, combined curve fitting, and epidemiological analyses, the latter including sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for hypoglycaemia. Finally, recommendations for much needed head-to-head studies are given. This paper is a revised and adapted version of How to assess and compare the accuracy of continuous glucose monitors?, Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics 2007, in press, published with permission of the editor.

摘要

随着越来越多的连续血糖监测设备进入市场,充分进行准确性评估的重要性日益凸显。本综述讨论了回归分析和相关系数、相对差异测量、布兰德-奥特曼图、ISO标准、联合曲线拟合以及流行病学分析(后者包括低血糖的敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值)的优缺点。最后,给出了关于急需的直接比较研究的建议。本文是《如何评估和比较连续血糖监测仪的准确性?》的修订和改编版本,原载于《糖尿病技术与治疗》2007年,即将发表,经编辑许可后发表。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验