Baxevanis Constantin N, Perez Sonia A, Papamichail Michael
Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Center, St. Savas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009 Mar;58(3):317-24. doi: 10.1007/s00262-008-0576-4. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
Accumulating evidence suggests that despite the potency of cytotoxic anticancer agents, and the great specificity that can be achieved with immunotherapy, neither of these two types of treatment by itself has been sufficient to eradicate the disease. Still, the combination of these two different modalities holds enormous potential for eliciting therapeutic results. Indeed, certain chemotherapeutic agents have shown immunomodulatory activities, and several combined approaches have already been attempted. For instance, chemotherapy has been proven to enhance the efficacy of tumor cell vaccines, and to favor the activity of adoptively transferred tumor-specific T cells. A number of mechanisms have been proposed for the chemotherapy-triggered enhancement of immunotherapy response. Thus, chemotherapy may favor tumor cell death, and by that enhance tumor-antigen cross-presentation in vivo. Drug-induced myelosuppression may induce the production of cytokines favoring homeostatic proliferation, and/or ablate immunosuppression mechanisms. Furthermore, the recently reported synergy between monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapy or peptide vaccination is based upon the induction of endogenous humoral and cellular immune responses. This would suggest that monoclonal antibodies may not only provide passive immunotherapy but can also promote tumor-specific active immunity. This article will review several strategies in which immunotherapy can be exploited in preclinical and clinical studies in combination with other agents and therapeutic modalities that are quite unique when compared with "conventional" combination therapies (ie, treatments with chemotherapeutic drugs or chemotherapy and radiotherapy based protocols). The results from these studies may have significant implications for the development of new protocols based on combinatorial treatments including vaccines, chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies, suggesting an exciting potential for therapeutic synergy with general applicability to various cancer types. Given the complicity of immune-based therapies and cancer pharmacology, it will be necessary to bring together cancer immunologists and clinicians, so as to provide a robust stimulus for realizing the successful management of cancer in the near future.
越来越多的证据表明,尽管细胞毒性抗癌药物效力强大,免疫疗法也能实现高度特异性,但这两种治疗方式单独使用都不足以根除疾病。不过,将这两种不同的治疗方式结合起来具有产生治疗效果的巨大潜力。事实上,某些化疗药物已显示出免疫调节活性,并且已经尝试了几种联合治疗方法。例如,化疗已被证明可提高肿瘤细胞疫苗的疗效,并有利于过继转移的肿瘤特异性T细胞的活性。对于化疗引发的免疫治疗反应增强,已经提出了多种机制。因此,化疗可能有利于肿瘤细胞死亡,从而增强体内肿瘤抗原的交叉呈递。药物诱导的骨髓抑制可能会诱导有利于稳态增殖的细胞因子产生,和/或消除免疫抑制机制。此外,最近报道的单克隆抗体与化疗或肽疫苗接种之间的协同作用是基于内源性体液和细胞免疫反应的诱导。这表明单克隆抗体不仅可以提供被动免疫治疗,还可以促进肿瘤特异性主动免疫。本文将综述几种策略,即在临床前和临床研究中,将免疫疗法与其他药物和治疗方式联合使用,这些策略与“传统”联合疗法(即基于化疗药物或化疗与放疗方案的治疗)相比具有独特性。这些研究结果可能对基于联合治疗(包括疫苗、化疗和单克隆抗体)的新方案的开发具有重要意义,这表明治疗协同作用具有令人兴奋的潜力,可广泛应用于各种癌症类型。鉴于基于免疫的疗法和癌症药理学的复杂性,有必要将癌症免疫学家和临床医生聚集在一起,以便在不久的将来为实现癌症的成功管理提供有力的推动。