Suppr超能文献

金属装置植入前后斑贴试验的回顾性评估。

Retrospective evaluation of patch testing before or after metal device implantation.

作者信息

Reed Kurtis B, Davis Mark D P, Nakamura Krystal, Hanson Linda, Richardson Donna M

机构信息

College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol. 2008 Aug;144(8):999-1007. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.8.999.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the results of patch testing before or after metal device implantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective medical chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic medical center.

PATIENTS

All patients who underwent patch testing before or after metal device implantation.

INTERVENTIONS

Patch testing.

RESULTS

From January 1999 through March 2006, 44 patients underwent patch testing in conjunction with metal device implantation, 22 preoperatively and 22 postoperatively. The reason for preoperative patch testing was a history of allergy to metals. Five patients had positive results for a component of the proposed device. The reasons for postoperative patch testing were unexplained skin eruptions at the implantation site (13 patients), chronic joint pain (8 patients), and joint loosening (1 patient). None of the patients had positive patch test results to a component of the previously implanted device.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the numbers of patients in this study were small, patch testing performed before metal device implantation was helpful in guiding the choice of device selected. Patch testing after implantation was of limited value.

摘要

目的

回顾金属装置植入前后的斑贴试验结果。

设计

回顾性病历审查。

地点

三级医疗学术医学中心。

患者

所有在金属装置植入前后接受斑贴试验的患者。

干预措施

斑贴试验。

结果

从1999年1月至2006年3月,44例患者在金属装置植入时同时接受了斑贴试验,其中22例在术前,22例在术后。术前进行斑贴试验的原因是有金属过敏史。5例患者对拟植入装置的一种成分呈阳性反应。术后进行斑贴试验的原因是植入部位出现不明原因的皮肤疹(13例患者)、慢性关节疼痛(8例患者)和关节松动(1例患者)。没有患者对先前植入装置的一种成分斑贴试验呈阳性结果。

结论

尽管本研究中的患者数量较少,但金属装置植入前进行的斑贴试验有助于指导所选装置的选择。植入后进行斑贴试验的价值有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验