Lee A C K
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Public Health. 2008 Dec;122(12):1410-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
To examine the impact of humanitarian aid from the perspectives of local stakeholders in Sri Lanka following the tsunami disaster of December 2004.
Qualitative study using key informant and focus group interviews.
Key informant and focus group interviews were conducted with tsunami survivors, community leaders, the local authorities and aid workers sampled purposively. Collected data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Aid aggravated social tensions and the lack of community engagement led to grievances. There was a perceived lack of transparency, beneficiary expectations were not always met, and it was difficult to match aid to needs. Rapid participatory approaches to obtain beneficiary feedback in post-disaster settings are possible but have limitations due to respondent bias.
In order to mitigate adverse social impacts of their programmes, humanitarian aid agencies need to better understand the context in which aid is delivered. Beneficiary feedback is essential in disaster planning and response so that disaster response can be better matched to the needs of beneficiaries.
从2004年12月海啸灾难后斯里兰卡当地利益相关者的角度审视人道主义援助的影响。
采用关键 informant 和焦点小组访谈的定性研究。
对海啸幸存者、社区领袖、地方当局和援助工作者进行了关键 informant 和焦点小组访谈,这些访谈对象是有目的地抽取的。使用主题分析法对收集到的数据进行分析。
援助加剧了社会紧张局势,社区参与的缺乏导致了不满情绪。人们认为缺乏透明度,受益人的期望并非总能得到满足,而且很难使援助与需求相匹配。在灾后环境中迅速采用参与式方法获取受益人反馈是可行的,但由于受访者偏差而存在局限性。
为了减轻其项目的负面社会影响,人道主义援助机构需要更好地了解援助实施的背景。受益人反馈在灾难规划和应对中至关重要,以便使灾难应对能够更好地满足受益人的需求。