Suppr超能文献

评估水生环境中点源排放的极性有机微污染物浓度:测量还是建模?

Assessing the concentrations of polar organic microcontaminants from point sources in the aquatic environment: measure or model?

作者信息

Johnson Andrew C, Ternes Thomas, Williams Richard J, Sumpter John P

机构信息

Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Aug 1;42(15):5390-9. doi: 10.1021/es703091r.

Abstract

To carry out meaningful ecotoxicity studies on novel polar organic microcontaminants, it is essential to know what concentrations wildlife may be exposed to. Traditionally these values were obtained by analytical chemistry, but in recent years GIS water quality models have been developed which may offer a quick and reliable way of getting the same information. Thus, two ways of obtaining basically the same information now exist, and an issue, therefore, arises as to which method is the most appropriate to use in which situation. To address this issue we have critically reviewed and compared measuring and modeling approaches for the determination of sewage effluent and river water concentrations of organic microcontaminants. Where model predictions and chemical measurements can be directly compared in sewage effluents, receiving waters, and across catchments, reported model mean values have all been within 1 order of magnitude of the measured values, with typically no more than a 3- or 4-fold difference. Interlaboratory chemical analysis of some organic microcontaminants in effluents in the challenging ng/L range have provided results which have varied from one another by a similar margin. No such comparison has been carried out yet for GIS water quality models to determine variation in predicted concentrations. As the level of ecotoxicological effects of many chemicals is often considerably higher than the reported measured or modeled values, such errors that might occur will often be of no consequence. But due to their extraordinary potency, much more accuracy is required with some natural and synthetic hormones. Significantly, modeling is no more complex to conduct when dealing with contaminants at ng/L compared with mg/L concentrations, but the same cannot be said for chemical analysis. A combination of modeling and measuring techniques will give the greatest confidence in risk assessment.

摘要

为了对新型极性有机微污染物开展有意义的生态毒性研究,了解野生动物可能接触到的浓度至关重要。传统上,这些数值是通过分析化学获得的,但近年来已开发出地理信息系统(GIS)水质模型,它可能提供一种快速且可靠的方式来获取相同信息。因此,现在存在两种获取基本相同信息的方法,于是就出现了一个问题,即在何种情况下使用哪种方法最为合适。为了解决这个问题,我们对用于测定有机微污染物污水排放和河水浓度的测量与建模方法进行了严格审查和比较。在污水排放口、受纳水体以及整个集水区,当模型预测值和化学测量值能够直接比较时,报告的模型平均值均在测量值的1个数量级范围内,通常差异不超过3至4倍。在具有挑战性的纳克/升范围内对污水中一些有机微污染物进行的实验室间化学分析所提供的结果,彼此之间的差异幅度也大致相同。对于地理信息系统水质模型,尚未进行此类比较以确定预测浓度的变化情况。由于许多化学物质的生态毒理学效应水平往往远高于报告的测量值或模型值,因此可能出现的此类误差通常无关紧要。但由于某些天然和合成激素具有非凡的效力,所以对其要求的准确性要高得多。值得注意的是,与处理毫克/升浓度的污染物相比,处理纳克/升浓度的污染物时进行建模并不更复杂,但化学分析并非如此。建模和测量技术相结合将为风险评估提供最大的信心。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验