Resch-Genger Ute, Grabolle Markus, Cavaliere-Jaricot Sara, Nitschke Roland, Nann Thomas
Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Richard Willstaetter Str. 11, 12489 Berlin, Germany.
Nat Methods. 2008 Sep;5(9):763-75. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1248.
Suitable labels are at the core of Luminescence and fluorescence imaging and sensing. One of the most exciting, yet also controversial, advances in label technology is the emerging development of quantum dots (QDs)--inorganic nanocrystals with unique optical and chemical properties but complicated surface chemistry--as in vitro and in vivo fluorophores. Here we compare and evaluate the differences in physicochemical properties of common fluorescent labels, focusing on traditional organic dyes and QDs. Our aim is to provide a better understanding of the advantages and limitations of both classes of chromophores, to facilitate label choice and to address future challenges in the rational design and manipulation of QD labels.
合适的标记物是发光成像、荧光成像及传感技术的核心。标记技术中最令人兴奋但也颇具争议的进展之一,是量子点(QDs)——具有独特光学和化学性质但表面化学性质复杂的无机纳米晶体——作为体外和体内荧光团的新兴发展。在此,我们比较并评估了常见荧光标记物在物理化学性质上的差异,重点关注传统有机染料和量子点。我们的目的是更好地理解这两类发色团的优缺点,以促进标记物的选择,并应对量子点标记物合理设计与操作方面未来的挑战。