Birkmeyer John D, Dimick Justin B
Michigan Surgical Collaborative for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Annu Rev Med. 2009;60:405-15. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.60.062107.101214.
Surgical mortality varies widely across hospitals and surgeons, more so than would be predicted by chance alone or differences in case mix. Although a large body of research has suggested the importance of procedure volume, clinical mechanisms underlying variation in surgical mortality remain largely unknown. Payers, policy makers, and professional organizations have implemented a variety of large-scale strategies aimed at improving outcomes. Selective referral, process compliance, and outcomes measurement reflect different philosophies on how best to improve surgical quality and have distinct advantages and disadvantages. The optimal strategy may depend on both the clinical context (e.g., which procedure) and political realities.
手术死亡率在不同医院和外科医生之间差异很大,远远超过仅由偶然因素或病例组合差异所能预测的范围。尽管大量研究表明手术量的重要性,但手术死亡率差异背后的临床机制在很大程度上仍不为人知。支付方、政策制定者和专业组织已实施了各种旨在改善治疗效果的大规模策略。选择性转诊、过程合规性和结果测量反映了关于如何最好地提高手术质量的不同理念,且各有明显的优缺点。最佳策略可能既取决于临床背景(例如,何种手术),也取决于政治现实。