• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高低对比度下近视力测量的可重复性

Repeatability of near visual acuity measurement at high and low contrast.

作者信息

Lam Andrew K C, Tong Cecilia, Tse Jimmy, Yu Man

机构信息

School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Clin Exp Optom. 2008 Sep;91(5):447-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00235.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00235.x
PMID:18761475
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the repeatability of high- and low-contrast visual acuity (VA) measurements at near.

METHODS

Fifty-five normal subjects were recruited. Inclusion criteria included visual acuity of at least 0.00 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) on each eye at distance. One eye was selected for this study, either the one with a better acuity or randomly chosen if there was no difference between the two eyes. Near VA was measured in a random order with the PolyU high-contrast (PolyU-HC), the PolyU low-contrast (PolyU-LC), the Precision high-contrast (P-HC) and the Precision low-contrast (P-LC) charts at 400 mm. Measurements were repeated after one to two weeks. Repeatability was presented using the 95% limits of agreement between visits.

RESULTS

The between-visit repeatability was +/-0.063 logMAR for high-contrast and +/-0.141 for low-contrast using the PolyU charts. The between-visit repeatability was +/-0.120 logMAR for high-contrast and +/-0.110 for low-contrast using the Precision charts. Seventeen subjects had high-contrast VA better than -0.10 logMAR using Precision chart, which could not be measured by PolyU chart. The mean difference between high- and low-contrast VA was 0.108 from the Precision charts (median difference of 0.10 or one line).

CONCLUSIONS

The Precision charts could measure high-contrast near VA to threshold level. Practitioners should be aware of a VA difference of more than one line in repetitive measurement, at both high and low contrast. A difference in near high- and low-contrast VA of more than one line may warrant further investigation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定近视力时高对比度和低对比度视力(VA)测量的可重复性。

方法

招募了55名正常受试者。纳入标准包括每只眼睛在远距离时的视力至少为0.00最小分辨角对数(logMAR)。本研究选择一只眼睛,若两只眼睛视力无差异,则选择视力较好的那只眼睛,否则随机选择。在400毫米距离处,使用香港理工大学高对比度(PolyU-HC)、香港理工大学低对比度(PolyU-LC)、Precision高对比度(P-HC)和Precision低对比度(P-LC)视力表以随机顺序测量近视力。一到两周后重复测量。使用两次检查之间的95%一致性界限来表示可重复性。

结果

使用PolyU视力表时,高对比度的两次检查之间可重复性为±0.063 logMAR,低对比度为±0.141 logMAR。使用Precision视力表时,高对比度的两次检查之间可重复性为±0.120 logMAR,低对比度为±0.110 logMAR。17名受试者使用Precision视力表时高对比度视力优于-0.10 logMAR,而使用PolyU视力表无法测量。Precision视力表显示高对比度和低对比度视力之间的平均差异为0.108(中位数差异为0.10或一行)。

结论

Precision视力表可以将高对比度近视力测量到阈值水平。从业者应注意在重复测量中,高对比度和低对比度下视力差异超过一行的情况。近高对比度和低对比度视力差异超过一行可能需要进一步调查。

相似文献

1
Repeatability of near visual acuity measurement at high and low contrast.高低对比度下近视力测量的可重复性
Clin Exp Optom. 2008 Sep;91(5):447-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00235.x.
2
Repeatability of the Waterloo Four-Contrast LogMAR Visual Acuity chart and Near Vision Test card on a group of normal young adults.滑铁卢四对比度对数最小分辨角视力表和近视力测试卡对一组正常年轻成年人的重复性
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004 Sep;24(5):427-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00216.x.
3
Repeatability of mesopic visual acuity measurements using high- and low-contrast ETDRS letter charts.使用高对比度和低对比度 ETDRS 字母图表测量中间视觉视力的重复性。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 May;253(5):791-5. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2876-z. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
4
Impaired mesopic visual acuity in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration.早期年龄相关性黄斑变性眼中的中间视觉视力受损。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Oct 23;53(11):7310-4. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8649.
5
Metrics of retinal image quality predict visual performance in eyes with 20/17 or better visual acuity.视网膜图像质量指标可预测视力为20/17或更佳的眼睛的视觉表现。
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Sep;83(9):635-40. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000232842.60932.af.
6
The repeatability of best corrected acuity in normal and amblyopic children 4 to 12 years of age.4至12岁正常及弱视儿童最佳矫正视力的可重复性
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Feb;47(2):614-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0610.
7
Refractive error and visual acuity changes in orthokeratology patients.角膜塑形术患者的屈光不正和视力变化
Optom Vis Sci. 2007 May;84(5):410-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31804f5acc.
8
Comparison of visual acuity charts in young adults and patients with diabetic retinopathy.年轻成年人与糖尿病视网膜病变患者视力表的比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Feb;90(2):174-8. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31827ce251.
9
Comparison of applicability of different visual acuity charts for pediatric outpatient visual tests.不同视力表在儿科门诊视力检查中的适用性比较。
Eye Sci. 2014 Jun;29(2):90-4.
10
An evaluation of the M&S technologies smart system II for visual acuity measurement in young visually-normal adults.对用于年轻视力正常成年人视力测量的玛莎百货(M&S)技术智能系统II的评估。
Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;84(3):218-23. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3180339f30.

引用本文的文献

1
Preliminary Application of a Continuous Functional Contrast Visual Acuity System in the Assessment of Visual Function in Dry Eye Patients.连续功能性对比视力系统在干眼症患者视觉功能评估中的初步应用。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Dec 1;12(12):6. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.12.6.
2
Quantification of the Dynamic Visual Acuity Space at Real-World Luminances and Contrasts: The VA-CAL Test.在真实世界亮度和对比度下动态视力空间的量化:VA-CAL测试。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Apr 1;11(4):12. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.4.12.
3
Development of core outcome sets and core outcome measures for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders due to stroke: a Delphi and consensus study.
开发因中风引起的中央视觉障碍、视野损失和眼球运动障碍的核心结局集和核心结局测量:德尔福和共识研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 18;12(3):e056792. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056792.
4
Minimum Detectable Change of Visual Acuity Measurements Using ETDRS Charts (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study).使用 ETDRS 图表(早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究)测量视力的最小可检测变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 25;18(15):7876. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157876.
5
Age Differences in Visual Attention and Responses to Intergenerational and Non-intergenerational Workplace Conflicts.视觉注意力以及对代际和非代际职场冲突反应中的年龄差异。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 7;12:604717. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604717. eCollection 2021.
6
The effect of astigmatic axis on visual acuity measured with different alphabets in Roman alphabet readers.散光轴对使用不同字母表的罗马字母阅读者测量的视力的影响。
Clin Optom (Auckl). 2018 Aug 6;10:93-102. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S166786. eCollection 2018.
7
Repeatability of mesopic visual acuity measurements using high- and low-contrast ETDRS letter charts.使用高对比度和低对比度 ETDRS 字母图表测量中间视觉视力的重复性。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 May;253(5):791-5. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2876-z. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
8
Data quality and clinical decision-making: do we trust machines blindly?数据质量与临床决策:我们是否盲目信任机器?
Clin Exp Optom. 2009 May;92(3):173-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2009.00367.x.