Boos C J, Balakrishnan B, Blann A D, Lip G Y H
Haemostasis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology Unit, University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
J Thromb Haemost. 2008 Nov;6(11):1841-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03148.x. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
While coronary artery disease has been linked to both endothelial damage and cellular apoptosis, their inter-relationships and impact on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes has been barely explored.
First, we investigated the inter-relationships between circulating endothelial cells (CECs, and index of endothelial damage) and circulating plasma markers of endothelial damage/dysfunction [von Willebrand factor (VWF), soluble E selectin (sEsel)] and apoptosis [soluble Fas (sFas), Fas ligand (sFasL) and their ratio, sFas/sFasL] in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Second, we assessed their prognostic values for major adverse CV events (MACE) in ACS.
We studied 211 patients with ACS, who were compared with 60 healthy controls (HC) and 45 'disease controls' (patients with stable coronary artery disease, CAD). Simultaneous blood samples for CECs (immunobead method), VWF, sESel, sFas and sFasL (ELISA) were taken within 24 h of presentation of ACS and at 48 h post admission.
CEC, sEsel and VWF levels were significantly higher among the ACS groups compared with the CAD and HC (P < 0.05) groups. sFas was higher (P = 0.016) and sFasL lower (P = 0.021) in ACS compared with controls (HC and CAD). There was a significant increase in sFas/sFasL ratio with increasing disease severity (P = 0.0004). There were significant correlations between CECs and both VWF and sEsel (both P < 0.01) but no correlations between CECs and either sFas or sFas ligand. On univariate survival analysis, CECs were associated with an increased risk of both MACE [hazard ratio (HR) 2.4 (95% CI 1.2-4.1); P = 0.009] and cardiovascular death [HR 2.95 (95% CI 1.01-8.81); P = 0.047]. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, only VWF (and not CECs) remained as an independent predictor of MACE [HR 1.02 (95% CI 1.005-1.040); P = 0.009].
CECs were associated with abnormal plasma indices of endothelial damage/dysfunction and not apoptosis, despite abnormalities of all these markers being associated with ACS. VWF remained as an independent predictor of MACE, on multivariate analysis.
虽然冠状动脉疾病与内皮损伤和细胞凋亡均有关联,但其相互关系以及对心血管(CV)结局的影响鲜有研究。
首先,我们调查了急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者循环内皮细胞(CECs,内皮损伤指标)与内皮损伤/功能障碍的循环血浆标志物[血管性血友病因子(VWF)、可溶性E选择素(sEsel)]以及凋亡标志物[可溶性Fas(sFas)、Fas配体(sFasL)及其比值sFas/sFasL]之间的相互关系。其次,我们评估了它们对ACS患者主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的预后价值。
我们研究了211例ACS患者,并将其与60例健康对照者(HC)和45例“疾病对照者”(稳定型冠状动脉疾病,CAD患者)进行比较。在ACS发病后24小时内及入院后48小时采集同时期血样,用于检测CECs(免疫磁珠法)、VWF、sESel、sFas和sFasL(酶联免疫吸附测定法)。
与CAD组和HC组相比,ACS组的CEC、sEsel和VWF水平显著更高(P < 0.05)。与对照组(HC和CAD)相比,ACS组的sFas更高(P = 0.016),sFasL更低(P = 0.021)。随着疾病严重程度增加,sFas/sFasL比值显著升高(P = 0.0004)。CECs与VWF和sEsel均显著相关(均P < 0.01),但CECs与sFas或sFas配体均无相关性。单因素生存分析显示,CECs与MACE风险增加相关[风险比(HR)2.4(95%CI 1.2 - 4.1);P = 0.009]以及心血管死亡风险增加相关[HR 2.95(95%CI 1.01 - 8.81);P = 0.047]。多因素Cox回归分析显示,只有VWF(而非CECs)仍然是MACE的独立预测因子[HR 1.02(95%CI 1.005 - 1.040);P = 0.009]。
尽管所有这些标志物的异常均与ACS相关,但CECs与内皮损伤/功能障碍的血浆异常指标相关,而非与凋亡相关。多因素分析显示,VWF仍然是MACE的独立预测因子。