Suppr超能文献

晚期食管癌合并肺部受累患者的气道和食管支架置入术

Airway and esophageal stenting in patients with advanced esophageal cancer and pulmonary involvement.

作者信息

Paganin Fabrice, Schouler Laurent, Cuissard Laurent, Noel Jean Baptiste, Becquart Jean-Philippe, Besnard Mathieu, Verdier Laurent, Rousseau Denis, Arvin-Berod Claude, Bourdin Arnaud

机构信息

Service de Pneumologie, GHSR, St Pierre, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2008 Aug 29;3(8):e3101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003101.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most inoperable patients with esophageal-advanced cancer (EGC) have a poor prognosis. Esophageal stenting, as part of a palliative therapy management has dramatically improved the quality of live of EGC patients. Airway stenting is generally proposed in case of esophageal stent complication, with a high failure rate. The study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of scheduled and non-scheduled airway stenting in case of indicated esophageal stenting for EGC.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

The study is an observational study conducted in pulmonary and gastroenterology endoscopy units. Consecutive patients with EGC were referred to endoscopy units. We analyzed the outcome of airway stenting in patients with esophageal stent indication admitted in emergency or with a scheduled intervention. Forty-four patients (58+/--8 years of age) with esophageal stenting indication were investigated. Seven patients (group 1) were admitted in emergency due to esophageal stent complication in the airway (4 fistulas, 3 cases with malignant infiltration and compression). Airway stenting failed for 5 patients. Thirty-seven remaining patients had a scheduled stenting procedure (group 2): stent was inserted for 13 patients with tracheal or bronchial malignant infiltration, 12 patients with fistulas, and 12 patients with airway extrinsic compression (preventive indication). Stenting the airway was well tolerated. Life-threatening complications were related to group 1. Overall mean survival was 26+/-10 weeks and was significantly shorter in group 1 (6+/-7.6 weeks) than in group 2 (28+/-11 weeks), p<0.001). Scheduled double stenting significantly improved symptoms (95% at day 7) with a low complication rate (13%), and achieved a specific cancer treatment (84%) in most cases.

CONCLUSION

Stenting the airway should always be considered in case of esophageal stent indication. A multidisciplinary approach with initial airway evaluation improved prognosis and decreased airways complications related to esophageal stent. Emergency procedures were rarely efficient in our experience.

摘要

背景

大多数无法手术的晚期食管癌(EGC)患者预后较差。食管支架置入术作为姑息治疗的一部分,显著提高了EGC患者的生活质量。气道支架置入术通常在食管支架出现并发症时采用,但失败率较高。本研究旨在评估EGC患者在进行食管支架置入术时,计划性和非计划性气道支架置入术的疗效和安全性。

方法与结果

本研究是在肺部和胃肠内镜科室进行的一项观察性研究。连续的EGC患者被转诊至内镜科室。我们分析了因急诊入院或接受计划性干预的食管支架置入适应证患者的气道支架置入结果。对44例有食管支架置入适应证的患者(年龄58±8岁)进行了调查。7例患者(第1组)因气道食管支架并发症急诊入院(4例瘘管,3例恶性浸润和压迫)。5例患者气道支架置入失败。其余37例患者进行了计划性支架置入手术(第2组):13例因气管或支气管恶性浸润置入支架,12例因瘘管置入支架,12例因气道外压(预防性适应证)置入支架。气道支架置入耐受性良好。危及生命的并发症与第1组有关。总体平均生存期为26±10周,第1组(6±7.6周)明显短于第2组(28±11周),p<0.001)。计划性双支架置入显著改善症状(第7天95%),并发症发生率低(13%),且在大多数情况下实现了特异性癌症治疗(84%)。

结论

在有食管支架置入适应证时,应始终考虑气道支架置入。初始气道评估的多学科方法改善了预后,并减少了与食管支架相关的气道并发症。根据我们的经验,急诊手术很少有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e2d/2518104/0975d8a37c96/pone.0003101.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验