Wu Ligang, Fan Jihua, Belasco Joel G
Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine at the Skirball Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.
Curr Biol. 2008 Sep 9;18(17):1327-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.072.
In animals, both siRNAs and miRNAs are thought to diminish protein synthesis from transcripts that are perfectly complementary by directing endonucleolytic cleavage where they anneal, thereby triggering rapid degradation of the entire message [1-4]. By contrast, partially complementary messages are downregulated by a combination of translational repression and accelerated decay caused by rapid poly(A) tail removal [3, 5-12]. Here we present evidence that translational repression can also make a substantial contribution to the downregulation of fully complementary messages by RNA interference. Unlike mRNA destabilization, this inhibitory effect on translation is greater for perfectly complementary elements located in the 3' untranslated region rather than in the protein-coding region. In addition to known disparities in their endonucleolytic activity [13, 14], the four Ago proteins with which siRNAs associate in humans differ significantly in their capacity to direct translational repression. As a result, the relative effect of siRNA on targets that are fully versus partially complementary is influenced by the comparative abundance of the three nonnucleolytic Ago proteins, causing this on-target/off-target ratio to vary in a cell-type-dependent manner because of the dissimilar tissue distribution of these proteins. These findings have important implications for the efficacy and specificity of RNA interference.
在动物中,小干扰RNA(siRNA)和微小RNA(miRNA)都被认为通过在与转录本退火的位置引导核酸内切酶切割,从而减少与转录本完全互补的蛋白质合成,进而触发整个信使RNA的快速降解[1-4]。相比之下,部分互补的信使RNA则通过翻译抑制和由快速去除聚腺苷酸(poly(A))尾巴导致的加速降解的共同作用而下调[3, 5-12]。在此,我们提供证据表明,翻译抑制对RNA干扰介导的完全互补信使RNA的下调也有重要贡献。与信使RNA的去稳定化不同,这种对翻译的抑制作用对于位于3'非翻译区而非蛋白质编码区的完全互补元件更为显著。除了已知的核酸内切酶活性差异[13, 14]外,在人类中与siRNA结合的四种AGO蛋白在引导翻译抑制的能力上也存在显著差异。因此,siRNA对完全互补和部分互补靶标的相对作用受到三种非核酸酶AGO蛋白相对丰度的影响,由于这些蛋白在不同组织中的分布不同,导致这种靶向/脱靶比率在细胞类型依赖的方式下有所变化。这些发现对RNA干扰的有效性和特异性具有重要意义。