Nguyen-Khoa Bao-Anh, Goehring Earl L, Werther Winifred, Gower Emily W, Do Diana V, Jones Judith K
The Degge Group, Ltd, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep;126(9):1280-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.9.1280.
To compare the incidence rate of hospitalized myocardial infarctions (MIs) and cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) in subjects with and without neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
A retrospective database cohort study was performed in subjects with neovascular AMD and controls matched for age, sex, geography, and enrollment duration. Healthcare claims for the study period from January 1, 2002, to June 30, 2005, were used to identify subjects and outcomes. Incidence of hospitalized MI and CVA events and rate ratios adjusted for 11 risk factors were calculated.
In 7203 subjects with neovascular AMD and 20,208 controls, the rate of MI was 16.2 events per 1000 subjects with neovascular AMD and 23.1 events per 1000 controls. The adjusted rate ratio for MI was 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.72; P < .001) for subjects with neovascular AMD vs controls. The rate of CVA was 14.3 events per 1000 subjects with neovascular AMD and 22.1 events per 1000 controls. The adjusted rate ratio for CVA was 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.70; P < .001).
Rates of MI or CVA were significantly lower in subjects with neovascular AMD than in controls. These findings could not be explained by systematic differences in case selection, health care use, or comorbidities, although other possible biases cannot be ruled out.
比较患有和未患有新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的受试者中住院心肌梗死(MI)和脑血管意外(CVA)的发病率。
对患有新生血管性AMD的受试者以及在年龄、性别、地理位置和入组时间方面相匹配的对照组进行了一项回顾性数据库队列研究。使用2002年1月1日至2005年6月30日研究期间的医疗保健理赔数据来确定受试者和研究结果。计算了住院MI和CVA事件的发病率以及针对11种风险因素调整后的率比。
在7203名患有新生血管性AMD的受试者和20208名对照组中,每1000名患有新生血管性AMD的受试者中MI发生率为16.2例,每1000名对照组中为23.1例。患有新生血管性AMD的受试者与对照组相比,MI的调整率比为0.58(95%置信区间,0.48 - 0.72;P < 0.001)。每1000名患有新生血管性AMD的受试者中CVA发生率为14.3例,每1000名对照组中为22.1例。CVA的调整率比为0.56(95%置信区间,0.45 - 0.70;P < 0.001)。
患有新生血管性AMD的受试者中MI或CVA的发生率显著低于对照组。尽管不能排除其他可能的偏倚,但这些发现无法用病例选择、医疗保健使用或合并症方面的系统差异来解释。