Pieniak Zuzanna, Verbeke Wim, Perez-Cueto Federico, Brunsø Karen, De Henauw Stefaan
Department of Agricultural Economics, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
BMC Public Health. 2008 Sep 10;8:306. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-306.
The purpose of this study was to explore the cross-cultural differences in the frequency of fish intake and in motivations for fish consumption between people from households with (CVD+) or without (CVD-) medical history of cardiovascular disease, using data obtained in five European countries.
A cross-sectional consumer survey was carried out in November-December 2004 with representative household samples from Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Poland and Spain. The sample consisted of 4,786 respondents, aged 18-84 and who were responsible for food purchasing and cooking in the household.
Individuals from households in the CVD+ group consumed fish more frequently in Belgium and in Denmark as compared to those in the CVD- group. The consumption of fatty fish, which is the main sources of omega-3 PUFA associated with prevention of cardiovascular diseases, was on the same level for the two CVD groups in the majority of the countries, except in Belgium where CVD+ subjects reported to eat fatty fish significantly more frequently than CVD- subjects. All respondents perceived fish as a very healthy and nutritious food product. Only Danish consumers reported a higher subjective and objective knowledge related to nutrition issues about fish. In the other countries, objective knowledge about fish was on a low level, similar for CVD+ as for CVD- subjects, despite a higher claimed use of medical information sources about fish among CVD+ subjects.
Although a number of differences between CVD- and CVD+ subjects with respect to their frequency of fish intake are uncovered, the findings suggest that fish consumption traditions and habits - rather than a medical history of CVD - account for large differences between the countries, particularly in fatty fish consumption. This study exemplifies the need for nutrition education and more effective communication about fish, not only to the people facing chronic diseases, but also to the broader public. European consumers are convinced that eating fish is healthy, but particular emphasis should be made on communicating benefits especially from fatty fish consumption.
本研究旨在利用在五个欧洲国家收集的数据,探讨有心血管疾病病史(CVD+)和无心血管疾病病史(CVD-)家庭的人群在鱼类摄入量频率以及鱼类消费动机方面的跨文化差异。
2004年11月至12月进行了一项横断面消费者调查,样本来自比利时、荷兰、丹麦、波兰和西班牙具有代表性的家庭。样本包括4786名年龄在18 - 84岁之间、负责家庭食品采购和烹饪的受访者。
与CVD-组相比,CVD+组家庭中的个体在比利时和丹麦更频繁地食用鱼类。富含omega-3多不饱和脂肪酸(与预防心血管疾病相关)的肥鱼消费,在大多数国家的两个CVD组中处于同一水平,但在比利时,CVD+组的受访者报告食用肥鱼的频率明显高于CVD-组。所有受访者都认为鱼类是非常健康和营养的食品。只有丹麦消费者报告在鱼类营养问题方面有更高的主观和客观知识。在其他国家,尽管CVD+组受访者声称更多地使用了关于鱼类的医学信息来源,但他们对鱼类的客观知识水平较低,CVD+组和CVD-组相似。
尽管发现CVD-组和CVD+组在鱼类摄入量频率方面存在一些差异,但研究结果表明,各国之间的巨大差异主要是由鱼类消费传统和习惯造成的,而非心血管疾病病史。本研究表明,不仅需要对慢性病患者,还需要对更广泛的公众进行营养教育以及关于鱼类的更有效沟通。欧洲消费者确信吃鱼有益健康,但应特别强调宣传食用肥鱼的益处。