Rawn James
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008 Oct;21(5):664-8. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32830f1fd1.
Clinical research has identified blood transfusion as an independent risk factor for immediate and long-term adverse outcomes, including an increased risk of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, renal failure, infection and malignancy. New findings have called into question the traditional assumptions clinicians utilize in evaluating the risks and benefits of blood transfusion. Appreciation of newly recognized risks is important for conserving scarce resources and optimizing patient outcomes.
Recent clinical outcomes research has examined the impact of blood transfusion on critically ill patients, trauma patients, patients undergoing cardiac surgery, patients experiencing acute coronary syndromes, oncology patients and others. These studies provide additional evidence of adverse outcomes associated with blood transfusion in a wide variety of clinical contexts.
The benefits of blood transfusion have never been conclusively demonstrated, but evidence of transfusion-related harm continues to accumulate. Given the transfusion triggers that currently predominate in clinical practice it appears that clinical outcomes could improve significantly with more widespread adoption of restrictive transfusion strategies.
临床研究已确定输血是导致近期和长期不良后果的独立危险因素,这些后果包括死亡、心肌梗死、中风、肾衰竭、感染及恶性肿瘤风险增加。新发现对临床医生在评估输血风险和益处时所采用的传统假设提出了质疑。认识新发现的风险对于节约稀缺资源和优化患者治疗效果至关重要。
近期临床结局研究探讨了输血对重症患者、创伤患者、心脏手术患者、急性冠脉综合征患者、肿瘤患者及其他患者的影响。这些研究为在多种临床情况下输血相关不良后果提供了更多证据。
输血的益处从未得到确凿证明,但与输血相关的危害证据却在不断积累。鉴于目前临床实践中占主导地位的输血触发因素,看来更广泛地采用限制性输血策略可能会显著改善临床结局。