Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sana Kliniken Sommerfeld, Waldhausstr. 44, 16766, Kremmen, Germany.
Department of Orthopaedics, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus, Thiemstraße 111, 03046, Cottbus, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 May;144(5):1901-1905. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05232-6. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
There is a scarcity of scientific data regarding the correlation between alignment techniques during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and blood loss as well as transfusion rates. This study's hypothesis posited that intramedullary-aligned (IM) TKA exhibits higher blood loss and transfusion rates when contrasted with extramedullary-aligned (EM) TKA.
We conducted a retrospective examination of 883 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in 2021 at a solitary orthopedic center in Germany. These patients were divided into two groups based on their tibial alignment technique: extramedullary alignment and intramedullary tibial alignment.
In the intramedullary tibial alignment (IM) group, we observed a blood loss of 0.91 L, while in the extramedullary tibial alignment (EM) group, the blood loss was 0.89 L. These values did not demonstrate a significant difference (p = 0.69). Transfusion rates were 0.99% in the IM group and 0.21% in the EM group, and there was no significant distinction between them (Chi-squared test: p > 0.05).
We observed no statistically significant variance in blood loss between the IM and EM groups. Likewise, there was no substantial disparity in transfusion rates between these groups. It can be concluded that the selection of a knee arthroplasty system incorporating either intramedullary tibial alignment or extramedullary alignment does not significantly impact blood loss.
关于全膝关节置换术(TKA)中对线技术与出血量和输血率之间的相关性,目前科学数据较为匮乏。本研究假设髓内(IM)TKA 与髓外(EM)TKA 相比,出血量和输血率更高。
我们对 2021 年在德国一家骨科中心接受全膝关节置换术(TKA)的 883 例患者进行了回顾性检查。这些患者根据胫骨对线技术分为两组:髓外对线和髓内胫骨对线。
在髓内胫骨对线(IM)组中,我们观察到失血量为 0.91L,而在髓外胫骨对线(EM)组中,失血量为 0.89L。这些值没有显示出显著差异(p=0.69)。IM 组的输血率为 0.99%,EM 组为 0.21%,两者之间没有显著差异(卡方检验:p>0.05)。
我们观察到 IM 组和 EM 组之间的出血量没有统计学上的显著差异。同样,两组之间的输血率也没有实质性差异。可以得出结论,选择包含髓内胫骨对线或髓外对线的膝关节置换系统不会显著影响出血量。