Sidlauskas Brian
National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Evolution. 2008 Dec;62(12):3135-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00519.x. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
Understanding how and why certain clades diversify greatly in morphology whereas others do not remains a major theme in evolutionary biology. Projecting families of phylogenies into multivariate morphospaces can distinguish two scenarios potentially leading to unequal morphological diversification: unequal magnitude of change per phylogenetic branch, and unequal efficiency in morphological innovation. This approach is demonstrated using a case study of skulls in sister clades within the South American fish superfamily Anostomoidea. Unequal morphological diversification in this system resulted not from the morphologically diverse clade changing more on each phylogenetic branch, but from that clade distributing an equal amount of change more widely through morphospace and innovating continually. Although substantial morphological evolution occurred throughout the less diverse clade's history, most of that clade's expansion in morphospace occurred in the most basal branches, and more derived portions of that radiation oscillated within previously explored limits. Because simulations revealed that there is a maximum 2.7% probability of generating two clades that differ so greatly in the density of lineages within morphospace under a null Brownian model, the observed difference in pattern likely reflects a difference in the underlying evolutionary process. Clade-specific factors that may have promoted or arrested morphological diversification are discussed.
理解为何某些进化枝在形态上会发生极大的分化,而其他进化枝却不会,这仍然是进化生物学的一个主要课题。将系统发育树的科投影到多变量形态空间中,可以区分出两种可能导致形态分化不均的情况:每个系统发育分支的变化幅度不均,以及形态创新的效率不均。以南美鱼类超科无齿脂鲤科姐妹进化枝中的头骨为例,展示了这种方法。在这个系统中,形态分化不均并非源于形态多样的进化枝在每个系统发育分支上变化更大,而是源于该进化枝通过形态空间更广泛地分布等量的变化并持续创新。尽管在多样性较低的进化枝的整个历史中发生了大量的形态进化,但该进化枝在形态空间中的大部分扩张发生在最基部的分支,并且该辐射的更多衍生部分在先前探索的范围内振荡。因为模拟显示,在零布朗模型下,产生两个在形态空间中谱系密度差异如此之大的进化枝的最大概率为2.7%,所以观察到的模式差异可能反映了潜在进化过程的差异。文中讨论了可能促进或抑制形态分化的进化枝特异性因素。