J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1990;11(12):590-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1990.11.12.590.
The purposes of the two experiments presently reported were to determine a) the relationship between subject-dynamometer axis alignment and isokinetic trunk extension-flexion performance and b) the effects of short-term acclimation to the isokinetic dynamometer on the magnitude of isokinetic trunk extension-flexion variables for low back pain and asymptomatic subjects. In the first study, three anatomic landmarks were selected for fixed axis alignment, the anterior superior iliac spine, the femoral greater trochanter, and the posterior superior iliac spine. Ten healthy women performed five reciprocal maximal effort, 100 degrees , concentric contraction trunk extension-flexion cycles at three isokinetic speeds (60, 120, 180 degrees /sec) for each of three subject-dynamometer configurations. Peak torque and the trunk angle at which peak torque occurred for both trunk extension and flexion were analyzed. A 3 x 3 analysis of variance did not provide definitive statistical evidence of the superiority of one alignment over the others. The data generated with the anterior superior iliac spine alignment, however, was more consistent than others relative to expected speed-torque relationships and was associated with the overall smallest variability of the data. In the second study, 8 healthy men and 10 men with a history of low back pain were studied with a within-session, test-retest protocol. The peak torque and total mechanical work for trunk flexion and trunk extension were analyzed. As a group, the low back pain subjects demonstrated universal and, in some cases, large performance improvement (>20%) at the retest. The results of the first study suggest that subject-dynamometer alignment using the anterior superior iliac spine is justifiable. Based upon the results of the second study it was concluded that a clinically relevant measure of sagittal plane isokinetic trunk flexion and extension function for low back pain patients should be collected using a test-retest protocol. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1990;11(12):590-598.
a)确定受试者-测力计轴对准与等速躯干屈伸性能之间的关系,b)确定短期适应等速测力计对腰痛和无症状受试者等速躯干屈伸变量幅度的影响。在第一项研究中,选择了三个解剖学标志用于固定轴对准,即前上髂嵴、股骨大转子和后上髂嵴。10 名健康女性在三种受试者-测力计配置下,以三种等速速度(60、120、180°/秒)进行了五次最大努力、100°、向心收缩的躯干屈伸循环。分析了躯干伸展和弯曲时的峰值扭矩和发生峰值扭矩的躯干角度。3×3 方差分析没有提供明确的统计证据表明一种对准优于其他对准。然而,与预期的速度-扭矩关系相比,使用前上髂嵴对准生成的数据更一致,并且与数据的整体最小变异性相关。在第二项研究中,使用单次测试-重复测试方案对 8 名健康男性和 10 名腰痛病史的男性进行了研究。分析了躯干弯曲和躯干伸展的峰值扭矩和总机械功。作为一个整体,腰痛患者在复测时表现出普遍的、在某些情况下是较大的(>20%)性能提高。第一项研究的结果表明,使用前上髂嵴的受试者-测力计对准是合理的。基于第二项研究的结果,得出结论,对于腰痛患者,应使用测试-重复测试方案来收集矢状面等速躯干屈伸功能的临床相关测量值。J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1990;11(12):590-598.