Aasland Olaf Gjerløw, Røvik Jan Ole, Wiers-Jenssen Jannecke
Legeforeningens forskningsinstitutt og Institutt for helseledelse og helseøkonomi Universitetet i Oslo.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008 Aug 28;128(16):1833-7.
The basis for preference and choice of specialty is a complicated mixture of individual interests and job opportunities. We wanted to investigate the possible explanations for such preferences and choices.
Two groups of Norwegian doctors, 421 who entered medical school in 1993 and 631 who completed medical school in 1993 and 1994, received four questionnaires between 1993 and 2003 which included questions on preference or choice of specialty and possible motives for this.
Individual preferences change extensively over time, but there is also a remarkably stabile distribution between the specialist categories. A specialty's prestige was emphasized less after medical school and the importance of having an optimal combination of an interesting job and a good private life increased This was also the case after controlling for the female respondents. Those who chose surgery or internal medicine were more motivated by medical challenges and career possibilities, while those who chose psychiatry or general medicine were more motivated by conditions such as variety and time for own family.
The motives behind choice of specialty are complicated and difficult to interpret, but seem to be a combination of ambitions and prestige on one hand, and lifestyle and family on the other. Recruitment into low status specialties may be achieved by increasing the possibilities for doctors to lead more normal family and social lives.
专业偏好与选择的依据是个人兴趣和工作机会的复杂混合。我们想探究此类偏好与选择的可能解释。
两组挪威医生,一组是1993年进入医学院的421人,另一组是在1993年和1994年完成医学院学业的631人,在1993年至2003年期间收到了四份问卷,其中包括关于专业偏好或选择以及对此的可能动机的问题。
个人偏好随时间大幅变化,但专科类别之间的分布也相当稳定。医学院毕业后,专业的声望被提及得较少,拥有有趣工作和良好私人生活的最佳组合的重要性增加了。在对女性受访者进行控制后情况也是如此。选择外科或内科的人更多地受到医学挑战和职业可能性的激励,而选择精神病学或普通医学的人更多地受到工作多样性和有时间陪伴家人等因素的激励。
专业选择背后的动机复杂且难以解读,但似乎一方面是抱负和声望,另一方面是生活方式和家庭的结合。通过增加医生过上更正常家庭和社会生活的可能性,可以实现向低地位专业的人员招募。