Campbell Susan B, von Stauffenberg Camilla
Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009 Jan;37(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10802-008-9270-4.
We used data from a large, longitudinal study of children in the community, the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, to examine how well earlier measures of delay capacity, inhibitory control, planning, and attention predicted symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) assessed in third grade. Children with elevated symptoms of both inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity (n = 57) and with inattentive symptoms only (n = 80) were identified via mother and teacher reports using the "or" rule, as were children without significant symptoms (n = 790). Multinomial logistic regression analyses indicated that poorer performance on earlier measures of resistance to temptation, delay of gratification, response inhibition, attention, and planning obtained from 36 months to 1st grade predicted membership in the two symptom groups relative to the comparison group in 3rd grade, albeit with somewhat different patterns of predictors. Controls for 36 month school readiness and externalizing symptoms indicated that these results were generally robust and not an artifact of initial cognitive or behavioral differences. Implications for developmental models of ADHD are discussed.
我们使用了来自一项针对社区儿童的大型纵向研究——国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所早期儿童保育与青少年发展研究的数据,以检验早期的延迟能力、抑制控制、计划和注意力测量指标对三年级时评估的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)症状的预测效果如何。通过母亲和教师使用“或”规则报告,识别出注意力不集中和多动冲动症状均较高的儿童(n = 57)、仅存在注意力不集中症状的儿童(n = 80)以及无明显症状的儿童(n = 790)。多项逻辑回归分析表明,从36个月到一年级期间,在早期的抵制诱惑、延迟满足、反应抑制、注意力和计划测量指标上表现较差,预测了相对于三年级对照组而言,这两个症状组的成员情况,尽管预测指标的模式略有不同。对36个月时的入学准备情况和外化症状进行控制表明,这些结果总体上是稳健的,并非初始认知或行为差异的假象。本文还讨论了这些结果对ADHD发展模型的意义。