• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜活体供肾切除术的采用与发展五年经验:来自一个患者数量不多的中心的结果

Five-year experience of adoption and evolution of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: results from a center without large volume of patients.

作者信息

Hung C J, Lin Y J, Chang S S, Chou T C, Chuang J P, Chung P Y, Lin Y S, Lee P C

机构信息

Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, National Cheng-Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2008 Sep;40(7):2112-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.07.047.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.07.047
PMID:18790167
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Despite the advantages of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LDN), this technique is known to have a steep learning curve that makes worldwide adoption challenging, especially in institutions without a large patients volume. Herein, we have reviewed our 5-year experience of adoption and evolution of this surgical technique, examining the donor and recipient outcomes.

METHODS

Between September 2002 and June 2007, 40 LDNs were performed consecutively. Our surgical technique was mainly derived from the University of California San Francisco method. We retrospectively reviewed the donor demographics, operative characteristics, perioperative complication of donors/recipients, and outcomes of donors and recipients.

RESULTS

Among the 40 cases, 36 (90.0%) were left-sided LDNs. Mean operative time was 335.1 +/- 66.9 minutes, blood loss was 303.9 +/- 333.2 mL, and warm ischemia time was 243.2 +/- 127.0 seconds. Multiple renal arteries required bench arterial reconstruction in 7 (17.5%) donor kidneys. Three renovascular injuries occurred intraoperatively, and 2 (5.0%) required open conversion. The overall postoperative complication rate was 20.0%. Postoperative donor serum creatinine was 1.5 times higher than preoperative serum creatinine. All but one recipient was discharged with adequate renal function. Graft function continues in 36 of the 38 harvested kidneys (94.7%) during the follow-up period. One (2.5%) recipient developed ureteral necrosis, and no recipients developed vascular thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

LDNs can be performed with careful adoption and evolution in institutions without a large patient volume. The intraoperative complication rate of LDN can be reduced with experience.

摘要

目的

尽管腹腔镜活体供肾切除术(LDN)具有诸多优势,但该技术存在陡峭的学习曲线,这使得其在全球范围内的推广面临挑战,尤其是在患者数量不多的机构。在此,我们回顾了我们在采用和发展这种手术技术方面的5年经验,研究了供体和受体的结局。

方法

2002年9月至2007年6月期间,连续进行了40例LDN手术。我们的手术技术主要源自加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校的方法。我们回顾性分析了供体的人口统计学资料、手术特征、供体/受体的围手术期并发症以及供体和受体的结局。

结果

在40例病例中,36例(90.0%)为左侧LDN。平均手术时间为335.1±66.9分钟,失血量为303.9±333.2毫升,热缺血时间为243.2±127.0秒。7例(17.5%)供肾需要在手术台上进行动脉重建。术中发生了3例肾血管损伤,2例(5.0%)需要转为开放手术。总体术后并发症发生率为20.0%。术后供体血清肌酐比术前血清肌酐高1.5倍。除1例受体外,所有受体均在肾功能良好的情况下出院。在随访期间,38个切取的肾脏中有36个(94.7%)移植肾功能持续良好。1例(2.5%)受体发生输尿管坏死,无受体发生血管血栓形成。

结论

在患者数量不多的机构中,谨慎采用和发展LDN手术是可行的。随着经验的积累,LDN的术中并发症发生率可以降低。

相似文献

1
Five-year experience of adoption and evolution of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: results from a center without large volume of patients.腹腔镜活体供肾切除术的采用与发展五年经验:来自一个患者数量不多的中心的结果
Transplant Proc. 2008 Sep;40(7):2112-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.07.047.
2
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy 1997 to 2003: lessons learned with 500 cases at a single institution.1997年至2003年腹腔镜供肾切除术:单机构500例经验教训
Surgery. 2004 Oct;136(4):881-90. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.06.025.
3
Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy.与开放性供体肾切除术相比,腹腔镜活体供体肾切除术在早期和晚期肾功能方面具有相当的结果。
Urology. 2005 May;65(5):862-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.051.
4
Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open technique and how to reach quality standards: a single-center experience in Thailand.腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术:与开放手术技术的比较以及如何达到质量标准:泰国单中心经验
Transplant Proc. 2011 Dec;43(10):3593-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.08.115.
5
Do multiple renal arteries restrict laparoscopic donor nephrectomy?多条肾动脉会限制腹腔镜供体肾切除术吗?
Transplant Proc. 2004 Jan-Feb;36(1):105-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.11.064.
6
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience.腹腔镜供肾切除术:马里兰大学6年经验
J Urol. 2004 Jan;171(1):47-51. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000100221.20410.4a.
7
Laparoscopic right living donor nephrectomy.腹腔镜下右半活体供肾切除术
Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):631-2. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.126.
8
Outcomes of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy without intraoperative systemic heparinization.腹腔镜供肾切取术术中不使用全身肝素化的效果。
J Urol. 2010 Jun;183(6):2282-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.027. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
9
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at a low volume living donor transplant center: successful outcomes can be expected.低容量活体供肾移植中心的腹腔镜供肾切除术:有望获得成功结果。
J Urol. 2003 Sep;170(3):731-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000081648.65198.2d.
10
The first decade of a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy program: effect of surgeon and institution experience with 512 cases from 1996 to 2006.腹腔镜供肾切除术项目的首个十年:1996年至2006年512例病例中外科医生及机构经验的影响
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jul;209(1):106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.02.060. Epub 2009 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the Presence of 2 Renal Allograft Arteries Associated with Adverse Outcomes in Live Donor Kidney Transplantation?活体供肾移植中双肾移植动脉的存在是否与不良预后相关?
Eurasian J Med. 2023 Feb;55(1):74-77. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.0259.