• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜下右半活体供肾切除术

Laparoscopic right living donor nephrectomy.

作者信息

Husted T L, Hanaway M J, Thomas M J, Woodle E S, Buell J F

机构信息

University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45249, USA.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):631-2. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.126.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.126
PMID:15848481
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Left laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is preferred over right LDN due to technical ease. The purpose of this study was to compare results between right and left LDN and thereby determine whether substantial experience with right LDN can provide results equivalent to left LDN.

METHODS

All LDN from 2000 to 2004 were reviewed, and right LDN data compared to left LDN data. Statistical analyses included chi-square and Student t tests.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirteen left LDN (84%) were compared to 40 right LDN (16%). Donor age, gender, race, and body mass index, and multiple arteries were similar in right and left LDN groups. Operative and cold ischemia times were similar, but warm ischemia was longer for right LDN (3:55 +/- 1:22 minutes) than left LDN (3.18 +/- 1:06 minutes; P = .004). Despite this, renal allograft function was similar on postoperative day 7 (creatinine 1.77 +/- 1.21 for right LDN, 1.7 +/- 1.5 for left LDN) and at 1 year (right LDN 1.5 +/- 0.4, left LDN 1.23 +/- 0.28). Graft survival rate in the right LDN at 1 year was 97.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

This large experience with right LDN indicates that results comparable to left LDN can be obtained. This observation increases the options for LDN in patients with multiple left renal arteries, or with right renal cysts, or with right kidneys that are smaller in size compared to the contralateral left kidney.

摘要

引言

由于技术操作相对简便,腹腔镜下左肾供体切除术(LDN)比右肾LDN更受青睐。本研究的目的是比较右肾和左肾LDN的结果,从而确定丰富的右肾LDN经验是否能产生与左肾LDN相当的结果。

方法

回顾了2000年至2004年期间所有的LDN病例,并将右肾LDN数据与左肾LDN数据进行比较。统计分析包括卡方检验和学生t检验。

结果

将213例左肾LDN(84%)与40例右肾LDN(16%)进行了比较。右肾和左肾LDN组的供体年龄、性别、种族、体重指数以及多支动脉情况相似。手术时间和冷缺血时间相近,但右肾LDN的热缺血时间(3:55±1:22分钟)长于左肾LDN(3.18±1:06分钟;P = 0.004)。尽管如此,术后第7天肾移植功能相似(右肾LDN肌酐为1.77±1.21,左肾LDN为1.7±1.5),1年后也相似(右肾LDN为1.5±0.4,左肾LDN为1.23±0.28)。右肾LDN 1年时的移植物存活率为97.5%。

结论

大量的右肾LDN经验表明,可以获得与左肾LDN相当的结果。这一观察结果增加了在有多支左肾动脉、右肾囊肿或右肾比左肾对侧更小的患者中进行LDN的选择。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic right living donor nephrectomy.腹腔镜下右半活体供肾切除术
Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):631-2. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.126.
2
Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy for kidneys with multiple arteries.用于具有多条动脉的肾脏的腹腔镜活体供肾切除术。
Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):629-30. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.128.
3
Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: technique and comparison with left nephrectomy.腹腔镜右供体肾切除术:技术及与左肾切除术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2001 Dec;15(12):1390-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8135-5.
4
Do multiple renal arteries restrict laparoscopic donor nephrectomy?多条肾动脉会限制腹腔镜供体肾切除术吗?
Transplant Proc. 2004 Jan-Feb;36(1):105-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.11.064.
5
Right retroperitoneal versus left transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.右腹膜后与左经腹腔腹腔镜活体供肾切除术
Urology. 2004 May;63(5):857-61. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.12.027.
6
Five-year experience of adoption and evolution of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: results from a center without large volume of patients.腹腔镜活体供肾切除术的采用与发展五年经验:来自一个患者数量不多的中心的结果
Transplant Proc. 2008 Sep;40(7):2112-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.07.047.
7
Why we consistently use the left donor kidney in living related transplantation: initial experience of right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and comparison with left nephrectomy.为何我们在亲属活体肾移植中持续选用左侧供肾:右侧腹腔镜供肾切除术的初步经验及与左侧肾切除术的比较
Transplant Proc. 2006 Sep;38(7):1977-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.06.023.
8
Outcome of renal transplantation with multiple versus single renal arteries after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparative study.腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术后多支与单支肾动脉肾移植的结果:一项比较研究。
Urology. 2007 May;69(5):824-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.026.
9
Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy.与开放性供体肾切除术相比,腹腔镜活体供体肾切除术在早期和晚期肾功能方面具有相当的结果。
Urology. 2005 May;65(5):862-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.051.
10
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a plea for the right-sided approach.腹腔镜供肾切除术:支持右侧入路的呼吁。
Transplantation. 2009 Mar 15;87(5):745-50. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318198a3a6.

引用本文的文献

1
Maximizing the donor pool: left versus right laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy--systematic review and meta-analysis.扩大供体库:腹腔镜下左肾与右肾活体供肾切除术的比较——系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Aug;46(8):1511-9. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0671-8. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
2
Robotic-assistance does not enhance standard laparoscopic technique for right-sided donor nephrectomy.机器人辅助并不能提高右侧供体肾切除术的标准腹腔镜技术。
JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):202-7. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13427982376068.
3
Outcomes of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in the presence of multiple renal arteries.
存在多条肾动脉时腹腔镜供肾切除术的结果
Urol Ann. 2011 May;3(2):62-5. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.82169.
4
Donor complications following laparoscopic compared to hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy: an analysis of the literature.腹腔镜与手辅助活体供肾肾切除术相比的供体并发症:文献分析
J Transplant. 2010;2010:825689. doi: 10.1155/2010/825689. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
5
Maximizing the donor pool: use of right kidneys and kidneys with multiple arteries for live donor transplantation.最大化供体池:利用右肾和多支动脉肾进行活体供者移植。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Oct;23(10):2327-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0330-9. Epub 2009 Mar 5.