Johnston Alana E, Rossell Susan L, Gleeson John F
The Department of Psychology, School of Behavioural Science, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 Sep;196(9):694-701. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318183f882.
Semantic processing abnormalities are predicted to underlie thought disorder in schizophrenia. This study investigated semantic processing in relation to cognitive disorganization in schizotypy, a thought disorder analog. Schizotypy was measured in 53 healthy university students using the Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences questionnaire. All participants completed 2 semantic priming tasks; direct and indirect (referring to the degree of association between word pair stimuli) and within each task, half of the stimuli were presented with a short time interval between prime and target presentation and half with a long time interval. Correlational analyses suggested that increasing cognitive disorganization was significantly associated with greater priming on the indirect tasks only. Separate analyses of the male and female data also revealed that men scoring highly on cognitive disorganization exhibited more indirect priming and less direct priming, whereas the female schizotypy data showed no significant correlations with either priming task. These findings are indicative of abnormal indirect priming in schizotypy, which was more pronounced in the male participant group. The findings of the present study further support the proposal that semantic processing is abnormal in schizophrenia, without the presence of potentially confounding factors that have limited research with clinical populations.
语义加工异常被认为是精神分裂症思维障碍的潜在原因。本研究调查了与分裂型人格障碍(一种思维障碍类似物)中的认知紊乱相关的语义加工。使用《牛津-利物浦情感与体验问卷》对53名健康大学生的分裂型人格特质进行了测量。所有参与者都完成了两项语义启动任务;直接启动和间接启动(指词对刺激之间的关联程度),并且在每个任务中,一半的刺激在启动刺激和目标刺激呈现之间有短时间间隔,另一半有长时间间隔。相关分析表明,认知紊乱程度的增加仅与间接任务中的启动效应增强显著相关。对男性和女性数据的单独分析还显示,在认知紊乱方面得分高的男性表现出更多的间接启动和更少的直接启动,而女性分裂型人格特质数据与任何一项启动任务均无显著相关性。这些发现表明分裂型人格特质中存在异常的间接启动,在男性参与者组中更为明显。本研究结果进一步支持了精神分裂症中语义加工异常的观点,且不存在那些限制了对临床人群研究的潜在混杂因素。